Comparison of clinical performance of Ambu® AuraGain™ and BlockBuster® in anaesthetised preschool children-A randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 37333705
- PMCID: PMC10269989
- DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_286_22
Comparison of clinical performance of Ambu® AuraGain™ and BlockBuster® in anaesthetised preschool children-A randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background and aims: Supraglottic airway (SGA) devices are a boon to paediatric airway management. The clinical performances of the BlockBuster® laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and Ambu® AuraGain™ in preschool children were compared in this study.
Methods: After ethical approval and trial registration, this randomised controlled study was conducted on 50 children, aged 1-4 years, randomised into two groups. Appropriate sized Ambu® AuraGain™ (group A) and LMA BlockBuster® (group B) were placed as per the manufacturer's recommendation under general anaesthesia. Appropriate size of the endotracheal tube was then chosen and inserted through the device. Primary objective of the study was to compare the oropharyngeal seal pressure (OSP), and secondary objectives were the first attempt intubation success rate, overall intubation success rate, SGA insertion time, intubation time, haemodynamic changes and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complications. The Chi-square test was used to analyse the categorical variables, while the intragroup comparison of mean changes in outcomes was evaluated by the unpaired t-test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.
Results: Demographic parameters were uniformly distributed in both the groups. The mean OSP in group A was 26.6 ± 0.95 cm H2O and in group B was 29.08 ± 0.75 cm H2O. Both the devices were successfully inserted in all the patients. The success rate of blind endotracheal intubation through the device in first attempt was 4% in group A and 80% in group B. Postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complications were relatively less in group B.
Conclusion: LMA BlockBuster® provides higher OSP and provides a higher success rate of blind endotracheal intubation in paediatric patients.
Keywords: Airway management; Ambu® AuraGain™; LMA BlockBuster®; anaesthesia; laryngeal mask airway; oropharyngeal seal pressure; paediatric.
Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Ambu AuraGain and BlockBuster laryngeal mask for controlled ventilation in children undergoing minor surgical procedures under general anesthesia: A prospective randomized controlled study.Paediatr Anaesth. 2023 Jun;33(6):474-480. doi: 10.1111/pan.14653. Epub 2023 Mar 16. Paediatr Anaesth. 2023. PMID: 36866955 Clinical Trial.
-
A new second-generation supraglottic airway device (Ambu® AuraGain•) versus intubating laryngeal mask airway as conduits for blind intubation - A prospective, randomised trial.Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Jul;63(7):558-564. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_269_19. Indian J Anaesth. 2019. PMID: 31391619 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of success rate of BlockBuster® versus Fastrach® LMA as conduit for blind endotracheal intubation: A prospective randomised trial.Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Dec;63(12):988-994. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_396_19. Epub 2019 Dec 11. Indian J Anaesth. 2019. PMID: 31879422 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of i-gel®, Ambu® AuraGain™, Baska Mask, LMA® Protector™ for airway management of obese surgical patients - A randomised comparative study.Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Mar;69(3):289-295. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_755_24. Epub 2025 Feb 17. Indian J Anaesth. 2025. PMID: 40161916 Free PMC article.
-
Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.J Clin Anesth. 2016 Sep;33:298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 May 18. J Clin Anesth. 2016. PMID: 27555181 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative analysis of LMA Blockbuster® clinical performance: Blind versus Miller laryngoscope-guided insertion in paediatric general anaesthesia - A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial.Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Oct;68(10):875-881. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_186_24. Epub 2024 Sep 14. Indian J Anaesth. 2024. PMID: 39449841 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Woodall NM, Cook TM. National census of airway management techniques used for anaesthesia in the UK:First phase of the 4th National Audit Project at the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:266–71. - PubMed
-
- Cook T, Howes B. Supraglottic airway devices:Recent advances. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2011;11:56–61.
-
- Jagannathan N, Ramsey MA, White MC, Sohn L. An update on newer pediatric supraglottic airways with recommendations for clinical use. Pediatr Anesth. 2015;25:334–45. - PubMed
-
- Jagannathan N, Hajduk J, Sohn L, Huang A, Sawardekar A, Gebhardt ER, et al. A randomised comparison of the Ambu®AuraGain™and the LMA®supreme in infants and children. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:205–12. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources