Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 25:36:11006.
doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11006. eCollection 2023.

A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating National Organ Donation and Transplantation Programs

Affiliations

A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating National Organ Donation and Transplantation Programs

Charlotte Johnston-Webber et al. Transpl Int. .

Abstract

Conceptual frameworks are valuable resources that can be used to guide the planning, evaluation, and development of healthcare services. However, there are currently no comprehensive frameworks focused on organ donation and transplantation that identify the critical factors underlying a successful national program. To address this knowledge gap, we developed a conceptual framework that takes into account all major domains of influence, including political and societal aspects as well as clinical implementation. The framework was initially constructed based on a targeted review of the relevant medical literature. Feedback provided by a panel of international experts was incorporated into the framework via an iterative process. The final framework features 16 essential domains that are critical for initiating and maintaining a successful program and improving the health of patients with organ failure. Of particular note, these domains are subject to three overarching health system principles: responsiveness, efficiency, and equity. This framework represents a first attempt to develop a whole-system view of the various factors that contribute to the success of a national program. These findings provide a useful tool that can be adapted to any jurisdiction and used to plan, evaluate, and improve organ donation and transplantation programs.

Keywords: comparative analysis; organ donation; organ transplant; transplant system; transplantation policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
A conceptual framework for a national solid organ donation and transplantation program.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arah OA, Klazinga NS, Delnoij DMJ, Asbroek AHAT, Custers T. Conceptual Frameworks for Health Systems Performance: a Quest for Effectiveness, Quality, and Improvement. Int J Qual Health Care (2003) 15(5):377–98. 10.1093/intqhc/mzg049 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fazekas M, Ettelt S, Newbould J, Nolte E. Framework for Assessing, Improving and Enhancing Health Service Planning. Technical Report. RAND Eur; (2010).
    1. EDQM - European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines. Guide to the Quality and Safety of Organs for Transplantation. 7th ed. (2018). Available from: https://www.edqm.eu/en/news/new-release-7th-edition-guide-quality-and-sa... (Accessed February 5, 2020).
    1. EDQM - European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines. Newsletter Transplant - European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare - EDQM. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare; (2022). Available from: https://www.edqm.eu/en/ (Accessed December 6, 2022).
    1. OBEQUS. ODEQUS - Organ Donation European Quality System (2021). Available from: http://www.odequs.eu/results.html (Accessed February 9, 2021). - PubMed