Social and healthcare professionals' experiences of end-of-life care planning and documentation in palliative care
- PMID: 37334750
- PMCID: PMC10416050
- DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1894
Social and healthcare professionals' experiences of end-of-life care planning and documentation in palliative care
Abstract
Aim: To explore social and healthcare professionals' experiences of end-of-life (EOL) care planning and documentation in palliative care.
Design: A qualitative study with narrative methodology.
Methods: A narrative method with interviews was used. Data were collected from purposively selected registered nurses (n = 18), practical nurses (n = 5), social workers (n = 5) and physicians (n = 5) working in palliative care unit in five hospitals in three hospital districts. Content analysis within narrative methodologies was undertaken.
Results: Two main categories - patient-oriented EOL care planning and multi-professional EOL care planning documentation- were formed. Patient-oriented EOL care planning included treatment goals planning, disease treatment planning and EOL care setting planning. Multi-professional EOL care planning documentation included healthcare professionals' and social professionals' perspectives. Healthcare professionals' perspectives on EOL care planning documentation included benefits of structured documentation and poor support of electronic health record (EHR) for documentation. Social professionals' perspective on EOL care planning documentation included usefulness of multi-professional documentation and externality of social professionals in multi-professional documentation.
Conclusion: The results of this interdisciplinary study demonstrated a gap between what healthcare professionals consider important in Advance Care Planning (ACP), that is, proactive, patient-oriented and multi-professional EOL care planning and the ability to access and document this in a useful and accessible way in the EHR.
Relevance to clinical practice: Knowledge of the patient-centered EOL care planning and multi-professional documentation processes and their challenges are prerequisites for documentation to be supported by technology.
Reporting method: The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was followed.
Patient or public contribution: No patient or public contribution.
Keywords: care planning; clinical social work; death; documentation; electronic health records; end-of-life; healthcare professionals; palliative care.
© 2023 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.
References
-
- American Medical Association . (2022). Management of Medical Records. American Medical Association; Retrieved from https://www.ama‐assn.org/delivering‐care/ethics/management‐medical‐records
-
- Anderson, R. J. , Bloch, S. , Armstrong, M. , Stone, P. C. , & Low, J. T. (2019). Communication between healthcare professionals and relatives of patients approaching the end‐of‐life: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Palliative Medicine, 33(8), 926–941. 10.1177/0269216319852007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Angheluta, A. A. , Gonella, S. , Sgubin, C. , Dimonte, V. , Bin, A. , & Palese, A. (2020). When and how clinical nurses adjust nursing care at the end‐of‐life among patients with cancer: Findings from multiple focus groups. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 49, 101856. 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101856 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
