Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;26(5):1923-1930.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13800. Epub 2023 Jun 19.

How do (false) positively screened patients experience a screening programme for liver cirrhosis or fibrosis in Germany? A qualitative study

Urs A Fichtner  1 , Anita Arslanow  2 , Harald Binder  3 , Peter R Galle  2 , Christian Labenz  2 , Frank Lammert  4   5 , Julia Ortner  6 , Dominikus Stelzer  3 , Louis Velthuis  6 , Erik Farin-Glattacker  1
Affiliations

How do (false) positively screened patients experience a screening programme for liver cirrhosis or fibrosis in Germany? A qualitative study

Urs A Fichtner et al. Health Expect. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore psychosocial consequences of (false) positive liver screening results and to identify influencing factors for perceived strain within a multistage screening programme for liver cirrhosis and fibrosis in Germany.

Methods: Between June 2018 and May 2019, all positively screened patients were asked to participate in the study (n = 158). N = 11 telephone interviews and n = 4 follow-up interviews were conducted. Semi-structured telephone interviews were carried out. The analysis followed a structuring content analysis approach. Thereby, categories were first defined deductively. Second, the categories were revised inductively based on the data.

Results: The main themes found regarding the consequences of the screening were categorised in emotional reactions and behavioural reactions. Few respondents described negative emotional consequences related to screening. Those seem to be mostly driven by suboptimal patient-provider communication and might be worsened when transparent information transfer fails to happen. As a result, patients sought information and support in their social environment. All patients reported positive attitudes towards liver screening.

Conclusion: To reduce the potential occurrence of psychosocial consequences during the screening process, medical screening should be performed in the context of transparent information. Regular health communication on the side of health professionals and increasing patients' health literacy might contribute to avoiding negative emotions in line with screening.

Patient or public contribution: This study recognises the wide-ranging patients' perspectives regarding the consequences of liver screening which should be taken into consideration when implementing a new screening programme to ensure a patient-centred approach.

Keywords: cirrhosis; fibrosis; liver screening; patient-reported outcomes; psychosocial consequences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Morabia A, Zhang FF. History of medical screening: from concepts to action. Postgrad Med J. 2004;80:463‐469. 10.1136/pgmj.2003.018226 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holland WW. Book review. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;138:74‐76. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116779 - DOI
    1. Holmes TH, Rahe RH. The social readjustment rating scale. J Psychosom Res. 1967;11:213‐218. 10.1016/0022-3999(67)90010-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brodersen J, Siersma VD. Long‐term psychosocial consequences of false‐positive screening mammography. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11:106‐115. 10.1370/afm.1466 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. El Hachem Z, Zoghbi M, Hallit S. Psychosocial consequences of false‐positive results in screening mammography. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8:419. 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_4_17 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data