Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 19:6:e42274.
doi: 10.2196/42274.

Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Dashboards in Aged Care: Systematic Review

Joyce Siette  1   2 , Laura Dodds  2 , Fariba Sharifi  2 , Amy Nguyen  2   3 , Melissa Baysari  4 , Karla Seaman  2 , Magdalena Raban  2 , Nasir Wabe  2 , Johanna Westbrook  2
Affiliations
Review

Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Dashboards in Aged Care: Systematic Review

Joyce Siette et al. JMIR Aging. .

Abstract

Background: The use of clinical dashboards in aged care systems to support performance review and improve outcomes for older adults receiving care is increasing.

Objective: Our aim was to explore evidence from studies of the acceptability and usability of clinical dashboards including their visual features and functionalities in aged care settings.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted using 5 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL) from inception to April 2022. Studies were included in the review if they were conducted in aged care environments (home-based community care, retirement villages, and long-term care) and reported a usability or acceptability evaluation of a clinical dashboard for use in aged care environments, including specific dashboard visual features (eg, a qualitative summary of individual user experience or metrics from a usability scale). Two researchers independently reviewed the articles and extracted the data. Data synthesis was performed via narrative review, and the risk of bias was measured using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Results: In total, 14 articles reporting on 12 dashboards were included. The quality of the articles varied. There was considerable heterogeneity in implementation setting (home care 8/14, 57%), dashboard user groups (health professionals 9/14, 64%), and sample size (range 3-292). Dashboard features included a visual representation of information (eg, medical condition prevalence), analytic capability (eg, predictive), and others (eg, stakeholder communication). Dashboard usability was mixed (4 dashboards rated as high), and dashboard acceptability was high for 9 dashboards. Most users considered dashboards to be informative, relevant, and functional, highlighting the use and intention of using this resource in the future. Dashboards that had the presence of one or more of these features (bar charts, radio buttons, checkboxes or other symbols, interactive displays, and reporting capabilities) were found to be highly acceptable.

Conclusions: A comprehensive summary of clinical dashboards used in aged care is provided to inform future dashboard development, testing, and implementation. Further research is required to optimize visualization features, usability, and acceptability of dashboards in aged care.

Keywords: acceptability; aged care; clinical; dashboard; database; development; health information technology; usability; user interface design; visualization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary of perceived acceptability to key dashboard features.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Xie CX, Maher C, Machado GC. Digital health dashboards for improving health systems, healthcare delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol. OSF. 2020. [2023-05-16]. https://osf.io/8me96/
    1. Dendere R, Samadbeik M, Janda M. The impact on health outcomes of implementing electronic health records to support the care of older people in residential aged care: a scoping review. Int J Med Inform. 2021;151:104471. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104471. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1386505621000976.S1386-505... - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stadler JG, Donlon K, Siewert JD, Franken T, Lewis NE. Improving the efficiency and ease of healthcare analysis through use of data visualization dashboards. Big Data. 2016;4(2):129–135. doi: 10.1089/big.2015.0059. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/big.2015.0059 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peyman T, Moritz L. Designing user-adaptive information dashboards: considering limited attention and working memory. 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS); June 2019; Stockholm & Uppsala, Sweden. 2019.
    1. Kapadia V, Ariani A, Li J, Ray PK. Emerging ICT implementation issues in aged care. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84(11):892–900. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.07.002. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1386505615300198?... S1386-5056(15)30019-8 - DOI - PubMed