Effectiveness of techniques for insertion of nasoenteral probe in critical patients: Randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 37335732
- PMCID: PMC10194724
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033795
Effectiveness of techniques for insertion of nasoenteral probe in critical patients: Randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Introduction: despite being a common procedure, nasally placed small-bowel feeding tube insertion is not risk-free and can compromise patient safety. Due to the fact that nasally placed small-bowel feeding tube is commonly inserted '"blindly," with the patient head in the neutral position, sometimes the process becomes difficult and traumatic, and may present higher level of complexity in physiological or induced coma and intubated patients. Therefore, adverse events (AEs) route errors can occur during this procedure. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of different nasally placed small-bowel feeding tube insertion techniques in coma and intubated patients, in comparison with conventional method.
Methods: A prospective, randomized and controlled clinical trial will be carried out with coma and intubated patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Thirty-nine patients will be randomly divided into 3 groups: group who will have the tube inserted in a conventional manner with the head in the neutral position, group with the head positioned laterally to the right, and, finally, with the head in the neutral position, with assistance of a laryngoscope. The primary endpoint will be: first, second and total attempt success rate; and time required for the first successful attempt and the sum of all attempts. Complications during insertion included tube bending, twisting, knotting, mucosal bleeding, and insertion into the trachea. Patient vital signs will be measured.
Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Ma’mari QA, Sharour LA, Omari OA. Predictors of perceptions of patient safety culture and frequency of event reporting by critical care nurses in Oman: a model-building approach. Crit Care Shock. 2019;22:230–42. Available at: https://criticalcareshock.org/files/2019/08/predictors-of-perceptions-of... [access date December 25, 2022].
-
- World Health Organization; Geneva: 2021. The global patient safety action plan 2021–2030: identifying actions for safer primary health care. Available at: https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/patient-safety/poli... [access date November 25, 2022].
-
- Settani SS, et al. Nursing communication and its impact on patient safety. J Nurs UFPE online. 2019;13:1–7. Available at: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/view/239573 [access date February 25, 2023].
-
- Grosemans J, Bergs J, Vlaven A, et al. Defining a set of potentially preventable complications relevant to nursing: a Delphi Study among head nurses. J Nurs Manage. 2020;20:1–10. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jonm.13225 [access date February 25, 2023]. - DOI
-
- Zhao W, Bachelor CG, Zhang W, et al. The important role of positioning in nasogastric tube insertion in unconscious patients: a prospective, randomised, double‐blind study. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27:162–8. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28544238 [access date November 25, 2022]. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
