Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 1;62(12):3785-3800.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead289.

Systemic pharmacological treatment of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: a systematic literature review

Affiliations

Systemic pharmacological treatment of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: a systematic literature review

Laura Ross et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the evidence concerning systemic pharmacological treatments for SSc digital ulcers (DUs) to inform the development of evidence-based treatment guidelines.

Methods: A systematic literature review of seven databases was performed to identify all original research studies of adult patients with SSc DUs. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective longitudinal observational studies (OBSs) were eligible for inclusion. Data were extracted, applying the patient, intervention, comparison, outcome framework, and risk of bias (RoB) was assessed. Due to study heterogeneity, narrative summaries were used to present data.

Results: Forty-seven studies that evaluated the treatment efficacy or safety of pharmacological therapies were identified among 4250 references. Data from 18 RCTs of 1927 patients and 29 OBSs of 661 patients, at various RoB (total 2588 patients) showed that i.v. iloprost, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and atorvastatin are effective for the treatment of active DUs. Bosentan reduced the rate of future DUs in two RCTs (moderate RoB) and eight OBSs at low to high RoB. Two small studies (moderate RoB) indicate that Janus kinase inhibitors may be effective for the treatment of active DUs, otherwise there are no data to support the use of immunosuppression or anti-platelet agents in the management of DUs.

Conclusion: There are several systemic treatments, across four medication classes, that are effective therapies for the management of SSc DUs. However, a lack of robust data means it is not possible to define the optimal treatment regimen for SSc DUs. The relatively low quality of evidence available has highlighted further areas of research need.

Keywords: SSc (scleroderma); digital ulcers; management; pharmacotherapy; systemic treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flowchart of study selection

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Matucci-Cerinic M, Krieg T, Guillevin L. et al. Elucidating the burden of recurrent and chronic digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: long-term results from the DUO Registry. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:1770–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hughes M, Allanore Y, Chung L. et al. Raynaud phenomenon and digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2020;16:208–21. - PubMed
    1. Hughes M, Murray A, Denton CP, Herrick AL.. Should all digital ulcers be included in future clinical trials of systemic sclerosis-related digital vasculopathy? Med Hypotheses 2018;116:101–4. - PubMed
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J. et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Br Med J 2009;339:b2700. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Higgins JPT, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Sterne JAC.. Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J. et al., eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3. London: Cochrane, 2022.

Publication types

Supplementary concepts