Outcomes of recurrent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation according to presumed etiology
- PMID: 37336506
- PMCID: PMC10371407
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769124
Outcomes of recurrent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation according to presumed etiology
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potent risk factor for stroke. The presence of competing etiologies can modify disease outcomes and demand different treatment strategies.
Objectives: The primary purpose of the study was to examine the differences in outcomes for patients with AF admitted with a recurrent stroke, stratified according to the presumed etiology of the stroke.
Methods: We analyzed AF patients admitted for a recurrent ischemic stroke in an academic comprehensive stroke center. Recurrent strokes were categorized as "Cardioembolic", meaning AF without any competing mechanism, versus "Undetermined" etiology due to competing mechanisms. We used logistic regression to test the association between recurrent stroke etiology and favorable outcome (discharge home), after accounting for important covariates.
Results: We included 230 patients, with a mean age 76.9 (SD ± 11.3), 52.2% male, median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 7 (IQR 2-16). Patients with cardioembolic stroke (65.2%) had higher median NIHSS 8.5 (3-18) versus 3 (1-8) and were more likely to be treated with reperfusion therapies. The favorable outcome was reached by 64 patients (27.8%), and in-hospital mortality was 15.2% overall. After adjustment, there was no difference in outcome between patients with cardioembolic versus undetermined stroke etiology (odds ratio for discharge home: 1.41; 95% CI: 0.65-3.15).
Conclusions: In this single-center sample of AF patients with history of stroke, there was no difference in discharge outcomes between those with cardioembolic and those with undetermined stroke etiology. This question warrants examination in larger samples to better understand the importance of the stroke mechanism and secondary prophylaxis.
Antecedentes: Fibrilação atrial (FA) é um fator de risco importante para AVC. A presença de mecanismos concorrentes para o AVC pode modificar o desfecho e demandar estratégias de tratamento diferentes.
Objetivos: O objetivo primário do estudo foi examinar diferenças no desfecho de pacientes com FA admitidos por um AVC recorrente, sendo estratificados de acordo com a etiologia presumida do AVC. MéTODOS: Nós analisamos pacientes com FA admitidos por conta de AVC recorrente em um centro acadêmico terciário de AVC. Os casos de AVC recorrentes foram classificados como “Cardioembólicos”, sendo FA sem outros mecanismos alternativos, versus aqueles de etiologia “Indeterminada” por conta de mecanismos concorrentes. Foi usada regressão logística para testar a associação entre a etiologia do AVC recorrente e desfecho favorável (alta direto para casa) após controle para covariáveis importantes.
Resultados: Nós incluímos 230 pacientes, com uma idade média 76,9 anos (DP ± 11.3), 52.2% homens, com um escore mediano do National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) de 7 (IIQ 2–16). Pacientes com AVC cardioembólicos (65,2%) tiveram um escore de NIHSS mediano mais alto 8,5 (3–18) versus 3 (1–8), e com maior chance de tratamento com terapias de reperfusão. O desfecho favorável ocorreu em 64 pacientes (27,8%) e a mortalidade institucional foi de 15,2% no total. Após ajustes, não encontramos diferença no desfecho entre pacientes com AVC cardioembólico versus AVC de etiologia indeterminada (odds ratio para alta para casa: 1,41; 95% IC: 0,65–3,15). CONCLUSõES: Nessa amostra de pacientes com FA e história de AVC recorrente de centro único, não houve diferença no desfecho de alta entre aqueles com AVC cardioembólico e aqueles com etiologia indeterminada. Essa questão deve ser examinada em amostras maiores para melhor compreender a importância do mecanismo do AVC e a profilaxia secundária.
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The impact of competing stroke etiologies in patients with atrial fibrillation.Eur Stroke J. 2023 Sep;8(3):703-711. doi: 10.1177/23969873231185220. Epub 2023 Jul 4. Eur Stroke J. 2023. PMID: 37401394 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Frailty on Healthcare Outcomes after Cardioembolic Ischaemic Stroke Due to Atrial Fibrillation.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 27;21(3):270. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030270. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38541270 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Anticoagulants in Reducing Mortality and Disability in Cardioembolic Stroke Patients.Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 21;58(10):1323. doi: 10.3390/medicina58101323. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. PMID: 36295484 Free PMC article.
-
The Value of the Score for the Targeting of Atrial Fibrillation (STAF) Screening in Acute Stroke Patients.J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Jun;26(6):1280-1286. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.01.022. Epub 2017 Feb 24. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017. PMID: 28242246
-
Cardioembolic vs. noncardioembolic strokes in atrial fibrillation: frequency and effect of antithrombotic agents in the stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation studies.Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000 Jan-Feb;10(1):39-43. doi: 10.1159/000016023. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000. PMID: 10629345 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Wolf P A, Dawber T R, Thomas H E, Jr, Kannel W B. Epidemiologic assessment of chronic atrial fibrillation and risk of stroke: the Framingham study. Neurology. 1978;28(10):973–977. - PubMed
-
- Wang L, Ze F, Li J. Trends of global burden of atrial fibrillation/flutter from Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Heart. 2021;107(11):881–887. - PubMed
-
- Miyasaka Y, Barnes M E, Gersh B J. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation. 2006;114(02):119–125. - PubMed
-
- Friberg J, Scharling H, Gadsbøll N, Jensen G B. Sex-specific increase in the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (The Copenhagen City Heart Study) Am J Cardiol. 2003;92(12):1419–1423. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical