Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep;137(5):1361-1372.
doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-03035-9. Epub 2023 Jun 19.

Comparison of three massively parallel sequencing platforms for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping in forensic genetics

Affiliations

Comparison of three massively parallel sequencing platforms for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping in forensic genetics

Ran Li et al. Int J Legal Med. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Three MPS platforms are being used in forensic genetic analysis, i.e., MiSeq FGx, Ion S5 XL, and MGISEQ-2000. However, few studies compared their performance. In this study, we sequenced 83 common SNPs of 71 samples using the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit on MiSeq FGx, the Precision ID Identity Panel on Ion S5 XL, and the MGIEasy Signature Identification Library Prep Kit on MGISEQ-2000 and then the performance was compared. Results showed that the MiSeq FGx had the highest sequence quality but the lowest sequencing depth and allele balance. Discordant genotypes were observed at six SNPs, which may be caused by variants at primer binding regions, indel errors, or misalignments. Besides, two kinds of background noises, allele-specific miscalled reads (ASMR) and allele-nonspecific miscalled reads (ANMR), were characterized. MGISEQ-2000 showed the highest level of ASMR while Ion S5 XL had the highest level of ANMR. Site- and genotype-dependent miscalled patterns were observed at several SNPs on Ion S5 XL and MGISEQ-2000, but few on MiSeq FGx. In conclusion, the three MPS platforms perform differently with respect to sequencing quality, sequencing depth, allele balance, concordance, and background noise. These findings may be useful for data comparison, mixture deconvolution, and heteroplasmy analysis in forensic genetics.

Keywords: Comparison; Ion S5 XL; MGISEQ-2000; MiSeq FGx; Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Børsting C, Morling N (2015) Next generation sequencing and its applications in forensic genetics. Forensic Sci Int Genet 18:78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.02.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chiu CY, Miller SA (2019) Clinical metagenomics. Nat Rev Genet 20:341–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0113-7 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Turajlic S, Sottoriva A, Graham T, Swanton C (2019) Resolving genetic heterogeneity in cancer. Nat Rev Genet 20:404–416. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0114-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Young B, King JL, Budowle B, Armogida L (2017) A technique for setting analytical thresholds in massively parallel sequencing-based forensic DNA analysis. PLoS One 12:e0178005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178005 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Goodwin S, McPherson JD, McCombie WR (2016) Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat Rev Genet 17:333–351. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.49 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources