Examining a Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Telemedicine Model With High-Risk Patients in a Rural Community
- PMID: 37338130
- PMCID: PMC10563533
- DOI: 10.1177/19322968231180884
Examining a Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Telemedicine Model With High-Risk Patients in a Rural Community
Abstract
Background: Ongoing support is critical to diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) effectiveness, but difficult to realize, particularly in areas with limited resources. The objective of this feasibility study was to assess the impact of a virtual support model on diabetes outcomes and acceptability with high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes in a rural community.
Methods: In a 12-month nonrandomized trial in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), patients with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >9% were referred to the Telemedicine for Reach, Education, Access, Treatment, and Ongoing Support (TREAT-ON) program where a Diabetes Care and Education Specialist provided DSMES through videoconferencing. HbA1c change was compared in 30 patients in the intervention group (IG) to a propensity score-matched retrospective control group (CG) of patients who received in-person DSMES delivered by a DCES. Changes in HbA1c, diabetes distress, empowerment, self-care and acceptability were assessed within the intervention group (IG) between those who did and did not meet self-management goals.
Results: The IG experienced similar significant reductions in HbA1c as the CG. Most (64%) IG participants achieved their self-management goal. Goal attainers had a significant HbA1c decrease of 0.21% every 3 months as well as significant reduction in diabetes distress and improvement in general dietary intake. Regardless of goal attainment, IG participants reported high levels of acceptability with TREAT-ON.
Conclusions: This feasibility study suggests that TREAT-ON was well-received and as effective as traditional in-person DSMES. While findings augment ample evidence regarding DSMES benefits, the TREAT-ON model offers additional advantages and provides validation for telehealth to inform future practice in reaching and supporting self-management for high-risk patients in underserved areas.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, # NCT04107935.
Keywords: diabetes education; self-management; telemedicine; type 2 diabetes.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: LS, JK, and JN had research support from Becton, Dickinson and Company, and Sanofi, Inc. LS also served on the Bayer Advisory Board.
Figures
References
-
- Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Improving outcomes in chronic illness. Manag Care Q. 1996;4(2):12-25. - PubMed
-
- Stewart AF. The United States endocrinology workforce: a supply-demand mismatch. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(4):1164-1166. - PubMed
-
- Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Millbank Q. 1996;74(4):511-544. - PubMed
-
- Siminerio LM, Piatt G, Zgibor JC. Implementing the chronic care model for improvements in diabetes care and education in a rural primary care practice. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(2):225-234. - PubMed
-
- National Rural Health Association. About rural health care. Date unknown. https://www.ruralhealthweb.org/about-nrha/about-rural-health-care. Accessed April 3, 2023.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous