Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 20;7(6):e22.00264.
doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00264. eCollection 2023 Jun 1.

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Younger Patients: A Comparable Analysis of Patients Older and Younger Than 65 Years

Marisa Deliso  1 , Suriya Baskar, Pasquale Gencarelli Jr, Alex Tang, Jaclyn M Jankowski, Frank A Liporace, Richard S Yoon
Affiliations

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Younger Patients: A Comparable Analysis of Patients Older and Younger Than 65 Years

Marisa Deliso et al. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. .

Abstract

Introduction: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has become a popular option for the surgical management of rotator cuff arthropathy and complex fractures of the proximal humerus. However, there is a paucity of studies evaluating outcomes, especially between patients of different age groups. The purpose of this study was to compare functional outcomes and survivorship between patients older than 65 years (o65) and those 65 years and younger (y65).

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted at a single academic medical center identifying a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing rTSA between 2018 and 2020. The minimum follow-up time was 2 years. Patients were stratified into two groups for comparative analyses (y65 and o65). Patient demographics, perioperative and postoperative data, and functional outcomes were collected. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted to determine survivorship, defined as revision surgery or implant failure.

Results: Forty-eight patients were included for final analysis. Nineteen patients comprised the y65 group while 29 patients comprised the o65 group. No difference was observed in Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores at baseline nor at the latest follow-up between the two groups. Patients in the y65 group had significantly greater internal and external rotation (IR/ER) from 3 months to 2 years compared with patients in the o65 group (P ≤ 0.05). Finally, there were no differences in revision surgery rates between the y65 group and the o65 group (11% vs. 14%, P = 1.0). A KM survival analysis revealed no difference in implant failure, necessitating revision surgery between the two groups at the latest follow-up (P = 0.69).

Discussion: Despite a notable difference in the number of baseline comorbidities, there were no notable differences in functional outcomes, survivorship, and revision surgery rates between each cohort. Although both groups had a similar function initially, by 3 months postoperatively, the y65 group had markedly greater range of motion in IR and ER. Longer term survivorship is needed; however, rTSA may offer a reliable option for shoulder reconstruction even in the y65 patient group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graph showing survival curve comparison by age cohort.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, Hovorka I: Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: Results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006;15:527-540. - PubMed
    1. Flatow EL, Harrison AK: A history of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:2432-2439. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Erickson BJ, Bohl DD, Cole BJ, et al. : Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: Indications and techniques across the world. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2018;47. - PubMed
    1. Wagner ER, Farley KX, Higgins I, Wilson JM, Daly CA, Gottschalk MB: The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: Rise and future projections compared with hip and knee arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020;29:2601-2609. - PubMed
    1. Rabinowitz J, Kothandaraman V, Lin J, Li X, Friedman RJ, Eichinger JK: Utilization of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States – an analysis of current trends and future predictions. Semin Arthroplasty JSES 2020;30:200-209