Single Long-Incision Minimally Invasive Surgery
- PMID: 37339279
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004752
Single Long-Incision Minimally Invasive Surgery
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: The objective of this study is to determine differences in outcomes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing spinal deformity correction surgery using a posterior spinal fusion (PSF) approach versus single and triple-incision minimally invasive surgery (MIS).
Summary of background data: MIS increased in popularity as surgeons' focus moved towards soft tissue preservation, but it carries technical demands and increased surgical time compared with PSF.
Patients and methods: Surgeries performed from 2016 to 2020 were included. Cohorts were formed based on surgical approach: PSF versus single long-incision MIS (SLIM) versus traditional MIS [3-incision MIS (3MIS)]. There were a total of 7 subanalyses. Demographic, radiographic, and perioperative data were collected for the 3 groups. Kruskal-Wallis and χ 2 tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
Results: Five hundred thirty-two patients met our inclusion criteria, 294 PSF, 179 3MIS, and 59 SLIM.Estimated blood loss (mL) ( P < 0.00001) and length of stay (LOS) ( P < 0.00001) was significantly higher in PSF than in SLIM and 3MIS. Surgical time was significantly higher in 3MIS than in PSF and SLIM ( P = 0.0012).Patients who underwent PSF had significantly lower postoperative T5 to T12 kyphosis ( P < 0.00001) and percentage kyphosis change ( P < 0.00001). Morphine equivalence was significantly higher in the PSF group during total hospital stay ( P = 0.0042).Patients who underwent SLIM and 3MIS were more likely to return to noncontact ( P = 0.0096) and contact sports ( P = 0.0095) within 6 months and reported lower pain scores ( P < 0.001) at 6 months postoperation.
Conclusion: SLIM has a similar operative time to PSF and is technically similar to PSF while maintaining the surgical and postoperative outcome advantages of 3MIS.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Guigui P, Blamoutier A. Complications of surgical treatment of spinal deformities: a prospective multicentric study of 3311 patients Review of Orthopedic and Restorative Surgery of the Motor Apparatus. [Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l’appareil moteur]. 2005;91:314–27.
-
- Carreon LY, Puno RM, Lenke LG, et al. Non-neurologic complications following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89:2427–32.
-
- Patil CG, Santarelli J, Lad SP, et al. Inpatient complications, mortality, and discharge disposition after surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis: a national perspective. Spine J. 2008;8:904–10.
-
- Weber BR, Grob D, Dvorák J, et al. Posterior surgical approach to the lumbar spine and its effect on the multifidus muscle. Spine. 1997;22:1765–72.
-
- Lam SK, Pan IW, Harris DA, et al. Patient, procedure, and hospital-related risk factors of allogeneic and autologous blood transfusion in pediatric spinal fusion surgery in the United States. Spine. 2015;40:560–9.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous