Rethinking the "Public" and Rethinking "Engagement"

Affiliations

Comment

Brandy Fox et al. Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jul.

. 2023 Jul;23(7):66-68.

doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2207517.

No abstract available

Comment on

The Promise and Reality of Public Engagement in the Governance of Human Genome Editing Research.
Conley JM, Cadigan RJ, Davis AM, Juengst ET, Kuczynski K, Major R, Stancil H, Villa-Palomino J, Waltz M, Henderson GE. Conley JM, et al. Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jul;23(7):9-16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2207502. Epub 2023 May 19. Am J Bioeth. 2023. Update in: Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jul;23(7):74-76. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2207533. PMID: 37204137 Free PMC article. Updated.

1. Blanchard J, Hiratsuka V, Beans JA, Lund J, Saunkeah B, Yracheta J, … & Spicer P (2020). Power sharing, capacity building, and evolving roles in ELSI: The Center for the Ethics of indigenous genomic research. Collaborations (Coral Gables, Fla.), 3(1). - PMC - PubMed
1. Martschenko DO et al. Wrestling with Public Input on an Ethical Analysis of Scientific Research. Hastings Center Report 53, S50–S65 (2023). - PMC - PubMed
1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). (2023). Using Population Descriptors in Genetics and Genomics Research: A New Framework for an Evolving Field. - PubMed
1. National Research Council. (2015). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. Committee on the Science of Team Science, Cooke NJ and Hilton ML, Editors. Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. - PubMed
2. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 10.17226/19007. - DOI - PubMed
1. O'doherty K, Gauvin FP, Grogan C, & Friedman W (2012). Implementing a public deliberative forum. Hastings Center Report, 42(2), 20–23. - PubMed