Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jun 20;23(1):321.
doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02476-z.

A randomized controlled pilot trial to assess the effectiveness of a specially formulated food supplement and pelvic floor muscle training in women with stress-predominant urinary incontinence

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized controlled pilot trial to assess the effectiveness of a specially formulated food supplement and pelvic floor muscle training in women with stress-predominant urinary incontinence

Peter Takacs et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is the first-line treatment approach for stress urinary incontinence. Creatine and leucine have been shown to improve muscle function. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of a food supplement and PFMT in women with stress-predominant urinary incontinence.

Methods: Women with stress-predominant urinary incontinence were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive daily oral supplementation for six weeks with either a food supplement (treatment group) or placebo (control group). Both groups were instructed to perform standardized daily PFMT. The primary outcome was the Urogenital Distress Inventory Short Form (UDI-6) score. Secondary outcomes were the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) score, Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S), and Biomechanical Integrity score (BI-score) measured by Vaginal Tactile Imager. To have a power of 80% and a significance level of 5% to detect a decrease of 16 points in the UDI-6 score, a sample size of 32 was needed, with 16 patients in each arm of our trial.

Results: Sixteen women in the control group and sixteen in the treatment group completed the trial. Between-group analysis revealed no significant differences between the control and treatment group except for mean change (delta) in vaginal squeeze pressure [(cmH2O, mean ± SD), 5 ± 12 vs. 15 ± 15, P = 0.04] and mean change (delta) in PGI-S score [(mean ± SD), -0.2 ± 0.9 vs. -0.8 ± 0.8, P = 0.04]. Within-group analysis showed that UDI-6 and IIQ-7 scores improved significantly from baseline to six weeks in the treatment group but not in the control group [UDI-6 score (mean ± SD) 45 ± 21 vs. 29 ± 21, P = 0.02; 43 ± 18 vs. 33 ± 26, P = 0.22] [IIQ-7 score (mean ± SD) 50 ± 30 vs. 30 ± 21, P = 0.01; 48 ± 23 vs.40 ± 28, P = 0.36]. PGI-S scores only improved in the treatment group from baseline to six weeks after treatment [PGI-S score (mean ± SD) 3.1 ± 0.8 vs. 2.3 ± 0.8, P = 0.0001]. BI-score, on average, improved significantly in the treatment and control group as well [SD unit, mean, from - 1.06 to -0.58, P = 0.001; from - 0.66 to -0.42, P = 0.04].

Conclusions: Women with stress-predominant urinary incontinence receiving a specially formulated supplement in addition to daily PFMT for six weeks had significantly improved urinary symptoms (decrease in UDI-6 score and IIQ-7) and BI-score compared to their baseline.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05358769. 27/04/2022.

Keywords: Creatine; Leucine; Pelvic floor; Urinary incontinence; Zinc.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

PT is a paid consultant for Fempharma LLC. All the other co-authors declared no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The flow of participants through the randomized clinical trial
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Boxplots for components of the Biomechanical Integrity Score At baseline and at the completion of the study: Elasticity (P = 0.035), Contraction, Support, Relaxation (P = 0.0004), and Mobility. BI-score was significantly improved (P = 0.0012)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bo K, Frawley HC, Haylen BT, Abramov Y, Almeida FG, Berghmans B et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the conservative and nonpharmacological management of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 2017 Feb;28(2):191–213. - PubMed
    1. Myers DL. Female mixed urinary incontinence: a clinical review. JAMA 2014 May 21;311(19):2007–2014. - PubMed
    1. Kinchen KS, Lee J, Fireman B, Hunkeler E, Nehemiah JL, Curtice TG. The prevalence, burden, and treatment of urinary incontinence among women in a managed care plan. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007 Apr;16(3):415–22. - PubMed
    1. Morrison A, Levy R. Fraction of nursing home admissions attributable to urinary incontinence. Value Health 2006 Jul-Aug;9(4):272–4. - PubMed
    1. Nambiar AK, Arlandis S, Bo K, Cobussen-Boekhorst H, Costantini E, de Heide M, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of female non-neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms. Part 1: Diagnostics, overactive bladder, stress urinary incontinence, and mixed urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2022 Jul;82(1):49–59. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data