Additional occult cancers identified on staging breast MRI: imaging appearances and pathologic characteristics
- PMID: 37340705
- PMCID: PMC10715349
- DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.694
Additional occult cancers identified on staging breast MRI: imaging appearances and pathologic characteristics
Abstract
Introduction: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used for staging of patients with breast cancer due to its high sensitivity in detecting additional cancers (ACs). However, the clinical impact of diagnosing and treating these cancers remains unclear.
Methods: A retrospective study was undertaken of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer who underwent staging MRI at The American University of Beirut Medical Centre (AUBMC) between 2012 and 2020. Pathology reports and breast MRI examinations were reviewed. Eighteen breast cancer patients with 19 pathology-proven index cancers (ICs) and 19 pathology-proven MRI-detected ACs were included. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon signed rank test for numerical variables were used to compare ICs to ACs.
Results: The ICs consisted of four ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 13 invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC), of which five with associated DCIS, and two invasive lobular carcinomas, (ILC) of which one with associated DCIS. ACs comprised 12 DCIS, five IDC, two with associated DCIS and two ILC, one with associated DCIS. Interval cancers were more frequently invasive whereas ACs were more frequently in situ (P = 0.021). ACs were more frequently nuclear grade 2 (P = 0.009). There was no statistically significant difference between ICs and ACs in lesion type (P = 0.062), shape (P = 0.073), initial enhancement (P = 1), delayed enhancement (P = 0.732), hormonal receptor profile (P = 0.68) and Ki67 (P = 0.388). Among ACs, ten (53%) were larger than 10 mm of which five (26%) were invasive cancers, and five (26%) were larger than the ICs.
Conclusions: ACs detected by breast MRI were more likely to be in situ and to show a nuclear grade 2. Although not reaching statistical significance, some ACs tend to be clinically significant by their type, size or nuclear grade. The impact on clinical management remains to be determined.
Keywords: breast MRI; breast cancer; pathology; staging.
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Is breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) useful for diagnosis of additional sites of disease in patients recently diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)?Eur J Radiol. 2017 Nov;96:74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Sep 28. Eur J Radiol. 2017. PMID: 29103479
-
MRI findings of cancers preoperatively diagnosed as pure DCIS at core needle biopsy.Acta Radiol. 2011 Dec 1;52(10):1064-8. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110213. Epub 2011 Oct 3. Acta Radiol. 2011. PMID: 21969708
-
BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.Breast J. 2007 Nov-Dec;13(6):545-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00513.x. Breast J. 2007. PMID: 17983393
-
Positive enhancement integral values in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of breast carcinoma: ductal carcinoma in situ vs. invasive ductal carcinoma.Eur J Radiol. 2014 Aug;83(8):1363-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 16. Eur J Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24894697
-
[The role of breast magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ].Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2013 May-Jun;141(5-6):402-8. doi: 10.2298/sarh1306402n. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2013. PMID: 23858817 Review. Serbian.
Cited by
-
Reliability of Kaiser Score in Assessing Additional Breast Lesions Identified on Staging MRI in Patients with Breast Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 8;14(16):1726. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161726. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39202214 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lehman CD, Isaacs C, Schnall MD, et al. Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high‐risk women: Prospective multi‐institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology 2007; 244: 381–8. - PubMed
-
- Sardanelli F, Podo F, Santoro F, et al. Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the High Breast Cancer Risk Italian 1 Study): Final results. Invest Radiol 2011; 46: 94–105. - PubMed
-
- Barco I, Chabrera C, García‐Fernández A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative setting for breast cancer patients with undetected additional disease. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85: 1786–93. - PubMed
-
- Debald M, Abramian A, Nemes L, et al. Who may benefit from preoperative breast MRI? A single‐centre analysis of 1102 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 153: 531–7. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical