Genetic parameter estimation for pork production and litter performance traits of Landrace, Large White, and Duroc pigs in Japan
- PMID: 37340733
- DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12814
Genetic parameter estimation for pork production and litter performance traits of Landrace, Large White, and Duroc pigs in Japan
Abstract
We estimated genetic parameters for two pork production and six litter performance traits of Landrace, Large White, and Duroc pigs reared in Japan. Pork production traits were average daily gain from birth to end of performance testing and backfat thickness at end of testing (46,042 records for Landrace, 40,467 records for Large White, and 42,920 records for Duroc). Litter performance traits were number born alive, litter size at weaning (LSW), number of piglets dead during suckling (ND), survival rate of piglets during suckling (SV), total piglet weight at weaning (TWW), and average piglet weight at weaning (AWW) (27,410, 26,716, and 12,430 records for Landrace, Large White, and Duroc, respectively). ND was calculated as the difference between LSW and litter size at start of suckling (LSS). SV was calculated as LSW/LSS. AWW was calculated as TWW/LSW. Pedigree data for Landrace, Large White, and Duroc breeds contained 50,193, 44,077, and 45,336 pigs, respectively. Trait heritability was estimated via single-trait analysis and genetic correlation between two traits was estimated via two-trait analysis. When considering the linear covariate of LSS in the statistical model for LSW and TWW, for all breeds, the heritability was estimated to be 0.4-0.5 for pork production traits and below 0.2 for litter performance traits. Estimated genetic correlation between average daily gain and backfat thickness was small, ranging from 0.057 to 0.112, and those between pork production traits and litter performance traits were negligible to moderate, ranging from -0.493 to 0.487. A wide range of genetic correlation values among the litter performance traits was estimated, while that between LSW and ND could not be obtained. The results of genetic parameter estimation were affected by whether the linear covariate of LSS was included in the statistical model for LSW and TWW or not. This finding implies the necessity of carefully interpreting the results according to the choice of statistical model. Our results could give fundamental information on simultaneously improving productivity and female reproductivity for pigs.
Keywords: genetic parameter estimation; litter performance traits; pig; pork production traits; ratio-defined trait.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Heritability and genetic correlation estimates of semen production traits with litter traits and pork production traits in purebred Duroc pigs.J Anim Sci. 2022 Mar 1;100(3):skac055. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac055. J Anim Sci. 2022. PMID: 35201314 Free PMC article.
-
Variance component estimates for alternative litter size traits in swine.J Anim Sci. 2015 Nov;93(11):5153-63. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9416. J Anim Sci. 2015. PMID: 26641035
-
Genetic relationship of litter traits between farrowing and weaning in Landrace and Large White pigs.Anim Sci J. 2019 Dec;90(12):1510-1516. doi: 10.1111/asj.13304. Epub 2019 Oct 17. Anim Sci J. 2019. PMID: 31625251
-
Genetic relationship between litter size traits at birth and body measurement and production traits in purebred Duroc pigs.Anim Sci J. 2020 Jan-Dec;91(1):e13497. doi: 10.1111/asj.13497. Anim Sci J. 2020. PMID: 33368835
-
Genetic associations of prolificacy with performance, carcass, meat quality, and leg conformation traits in the Finnish Landrace and Large White pig populations.J Anim Sci. 2004 Aug;82(8):2301-6. doi: 10.2527/2004.8282301x. J Anim Sci. 2004. PMID: 15318728
Cited by
-
Maternal intestinal L. vaginalis facilitates embryo implantation and survival through enhancing uterine receptivity in sows.Microbiome. 2025 Jun 18;13(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s40168-025-02141-7. Microbiome. 2025. PMID: 40533850 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Aguilar, I., Fernandez, E. N., Blasco, A., Ravagnolo, O., & Legarra, A. (2020). Effects of ignoring inbreeding in model-based accuracy for BLUP and SSGBLUP. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 137, 356-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12470
-
- Aikins-Wilson, S., Bohlouli, M., & König, S. (2021). Maternal and direct genetic parameters for tail length, tail lesions, and growth traits in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 99, skaa398. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa398
-
- Babot, D., Noguera, J. L., Alfonso, L., & Estany, J. (2003). Fixed or random contemporary groups in genetic evaluation for litter size in pigs using a single trait repeatability animal model. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 120, 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0388.2003.00372.x
-
- Banville, M., Riquet, J., Bahon, D., Sourdioux, M., & Canario, L. (2014). Genetic parameters for litter size, piglet growth and sow's early growth and body composition in the Chinese-European line Tai Zumu. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 132, 328-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12122
-
- Bouquet, A., Déru, V., Blanchet, B., Ganier, P., Flatrès-Grall, L., Ligonesche, B., Carillier-Jacquin, C., Labussière, E., & Gilbert, H. (2022). Digestive efficiency traits in growing pigs are genetically correlated with sow litter traits in the Large White breed. Animal, 16, 100447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100447
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources