Effect of constipation on acute urinary retention following transrectal prostate biopsy
- PMID: 37341007
- PMCID: PMC10172044
- DOI: 10.4111/icu.20230011
Effect of constipation on acute urinary retention following transrectal prostate biopsy
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the possible effect of constipation on the acute urinary retention (AUR) after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS PB).
Materials and methods: A total of 1,167 patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >4 ng/mL and/or abnormal digital rectal examination underwent a standard 12 core transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy in our hospital and the findings were examined prospectively. Chronic constipation (CC) was defined according to the Rome IV criteria. All cases were well evaluated with respect to clinical-histopathological factors; International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), prostate volume, post-void residue, age, body mass index, histopathological inflammation, and AUR.
Results: The mean age of patients was 64.63±8.31 years, the PSA level was 11.60±16.83 ng/mL, and the prostate volume was 54.66±25.44 mL. In 265 cases (22.7%), CC anamnesis was present and AUR developed in 28 (2.4%) of the cases. In the multivariate analysis for the risk of developing urinary retention, prostate volume, pre-operative IPSS, and presence of CC requiring manual maneuvers to facilitate defecation were found to be risk factors (p=0.023, 0.010, and 0.001, respectively).
Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that CC may be a critical factor in the prediction of AUR formation following TRUS PB.
Keywords: Biopsy; Constipation; Prostate; Urinary retention.
© The Korean Urological Association.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Emergency attendances and hospitalisations for complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: a five-year retrospective multicentre study.Hong Kong Med J. 2019 Oct;25(5):349-355. doi: 10.12809/hkmj197825. Epub 2019 Oct 11. Hong Kong Med J. 2019. PMID: 31601774
-
Factors influencing risk of acute urinary retention after TRUS-guided permanent prostate seed implantation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Feb 1;52(2):453-60. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02658-x. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002. PMID: 11872292
-
The Efficacy of Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy Versus Transperineal Template Biopsy of the Prostate in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer in Men with Previous Negative Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy.Urol J. 2017 Mar 16;14(2):3008-3012. Urol J. 2017. PMID: 28299763
-
Prospective evaluation of prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density in the detection of nonpalpable and stage T1C carcinoma of the prostate.J Urol. 1996 Nov;156(5):1685-90. J Urol. 1996. PMID: 8863571 Review.
-
Do alpha blockers reduce the risk of urinary retention post-transperineal prostate biopsy? A systematic narrative review.World J Urol. 2024 May 17;42(1):332. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05001-5. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 38758413 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Development and validation of a nomogram model for predicting acute urinary retention after transrectal prostate biopsy.Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jan 31;14(1):15-26. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-399. Epub 2025 Jan 21. Transl Androl Urol. 2025. PMID: 39974802 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol. 1989;142:71–74. discussion 74-5. - PubMed
-
- Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389:815–822. - PubMed
-
- Berger AP, Gozzi C, Steiner H, Frauscher F, Varkarakis J, Rogatsch H, et al. Complication rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a comparison among 3 protocols with 6, 10 and 15 cores. J Urol. 2004;171:1478–1480. discussion 1480-1. - PubMed
-
- Yu JH, Park YI, Sung LH, Han JH, Chung JY, Noh Ch. Evaluation of the risk factors for complications after prostate needle biopsy. Eur Urol Suppl. 2010;9:84–85.
-
- Simsir A, Kismali E, Mammadov R, Gunaydin G, Cal C. Is it possible to predict sepsis, the most serious complication in prostate biopsy? Urol Int. 2010;84:395–399. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous