Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;163(2):651-659.
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14905. Epub 2023 Jun 21.

Examining reuse and replacement procedures for Ipas manual vacuum aspiration and cannulae in nine countries

Elisabeth Eckersberger  1 , Sally Dijkerman  1 , Megan Perkins  2 , True Overholt  3 , Susana Asport  4 , Hina Aziz  5 , Ivania Barata  6 , Sumit Gulati  7 , Bekalu Mossie Chekol  8 , Leonard Mulase  9 , Jean-Claude Mulunda  10 , Ayodeji Oginni  11 , Marian Smith  12 , Bill Powell  1 , Nathalie Kapp  13
Affiliations

Examining reuse and replacement procedures for Ipas manual vacuum aspiration and cannulae in nine countries

Elisabeth Eckersberger et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To determine how many times Ipas manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) instruments are reused, for what reasons, when the instruments are replaced and/or discarded, and what the barriers are to replacing them.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods cross-sectional study of health care providers who provide MVA services and key stakeholders in the supply chain to understand reuse and replacement of Ipas MVA aspirators and cannulae. Qualitative interviews focused on procurement and replacement of Ipas MVA instruments.

Results: The authors interviewed 352 health care providers from nine countries from 2019 to 2021. Providers reported reusing MVA instruments an average of 34.4 times (standard deviation, 45). The reuse averages ranged from one time (Democratic Republic of the Congo) to 500 times (India), with figures varying between providers within the same country. Instrument malfunctioning rather than a specific number of uses drove reuse and subsequent replacement. The decision to replace was most commonly made by the provider during use. Half of the providers said that they knew of no issues with the supply chain, and 85% said they were always able to replace Ipas MVA instruments when needed.

Conclusion: Tracking reuse of MVA instruments was uncommon at participating providers' health facilities. Providers' estimates revealed great variability in reuse frequency and tracking procedures.

Keywords: abortion; cannulae; global; manual vacuum aspiration; reuse.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Wen J, Cai QY, Deng F, Li YP. Manual versus electric vacuum aspiration for first-trimester abortion: a systematic review. BJOG. 2008;115:5-13. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01572.x
    1. Edelman A, Nichols MD, Jensen J. Comparison of pain and time of procedures with two first-trimester abortion techniques performed by residents and faculty. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:1564-1567. doi:10.1067/mob.2001.114858
    1. Ireland LD, Gatter M, Chen AY. Medical compared with surgical abortion for effective pregnancy termination in the first trimester. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:22-28. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000910
    1. White K, Carroll E, Grossman D. Complications from first-trimester aspiration abortion: a systematic review of the literature. Contraception. 2015;92:422-438. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2015.07.013
    1. Powell B, Kapp N. Validation of instrument reprocessing methods for the Ipas manual vacuum aspiration devices. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2019;147:89-95. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12908

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources