Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 11;14(6):2618-2628.
doi: 10.1364/BOE.489117. eCollection 2023 Jun 1.

ON and OFF receptive field processing in the presence of optical scattering

Affiliations

ON and OFF receptive field processing in the presence of optical scattering

Katharina Breher et al. Biomed Opt Express. .

Abstract

The balance of ON/OFF pathway activation in the retina plays a role in emmetropization. A new myopia control lens design uses contrast reduction to down-regulate a hypothesized enhanced ON contrast sensitivity in myopes. The study thus examined ON/OFF receptive field processing in myopes and non-myopes and the impact of contrast reduction. A psychophysical approach was used to measure the combined retinal-cortical output in the form of low-level ON and OFF contrast sensitivity with and without contrast reduction in 22 participants. ON responses were lower than OFF responses (ON 1.25 ± 0.03 vs. OFF 1.39 ± 0.03 log(CS); p < 0.0001) and myopes showed generally reduced sensitivities (myopes 1.25 ± 0.05 vs. non-myopes 1.39 ± 0.05 log(CS); p = 0.05). These findings remained unaffected by contrast reduction (p > 0.05). The study suggests that perceptual differences in ON and OFF signal processing between myopes and non-myopes exist but cannot explain how contrast reduction can inhibit myopia development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

KB: Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH (E); AN: None; DK: None; FS: Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH (C); SW: Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH (E)

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Examples of stimuli for (a) OFF polarity at 1.5 cpd and (b) ON polarity at 6 cpd.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Example of a trial to test the ON condition at (a) central testing with 1.5 cpd and at (b) peripheral testing with 6 cpd.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Contrast sensitivity functions (least-squares mean ± standard error, n = 22 participants) for (a) central testing without scattering; (b) temporal 10° testing without scattering; (c) central testing with scattering and (d) temporal 10° testing with scattering. Asteriks denote significant differences between refractive groups for the same testing condition (* p < 0.05).

Comment in

References

    1. DeAngelis G. C., Ohzawa I., Freeman R. D., “Receptive-field dynamics in the central visual pathways,” Trends Neurosci. 18(10), 451–458 (1995).10.1016/0166-2236(95)94496-R - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith E. L., Hung L.-F., “Form-deprivation myopia in monkeys is a graded phenomenon,” Vision Res. 40(4), 371–381 (2000).10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00184-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hashimoto T., Katai S., Saito Y., Kobayashi F., Goto T., “ON and OFF channels in human retinal ganglion cells,” The J. Physiol. 591(1), 327–337 (2013).10.1113/jphysiol.2012.243683 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aleman A. C., Wang M., Schaeffel F., “Reading and myopia: contrast polarity matters,” Sci. Rep. 8(1), 10840 (2018).10.1038/s41598-018-28904-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ohlendorf A., Schaeffel F., “Contrast adaptation induced by defocus - a possible error signal for emmetropization?” Vision Res. 49(2), 249–256 (2009).10.1016/j.visres.2008.10.016 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources