Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 21;23(1):671.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09635-w.

Implementation of neurological group-based telerehabilitation within existing healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods evaluation

Suzanne Ackerley  1   2 , Neil Wilson  1 , Paul Boland  1 , Jessica Read  3 , Louise Connell  4   5
Affiliations

Implementation of neurological group-based telerehabilitation within existing healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods evaluation

Suzanne Ackerley et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: There is a need to evaluate if and how telerehabilitation approaches might co-exist within healthcare in the long-term. Our aim was to implement and evaluate a multidisciplinary group-based telerehabilitation approach for people engaging in neurological rehabilitation.

Methods: NeuroRehabilitation OnLine (NROL) was adapted and implemented within an existing healthcare system as a programme of repeating six-week blocks. A robust evaluation was undertaken simultaneously using a convergent parallel design underpinned by implementation frameworks. This included service data, and patient and staff interviews. Implementation success was conceptualised using the outcomes of appropriateness, acceptability and sustainability.

Results: Eight NROL blocks delivered 265 sessions with 1347 patient contacts, and NROL continues as part of standard practice. The approach was appropriate for varied demographics and had positive patient opinions and outcomes for many. Staff perceived NROL provided a compatible means to increase therapy and help meet targets, despite needing to mitigate some challenges when fitting the approach within the existing system. NROL was considered acceptable due to good attendance (68%), low drop-out (12%), and a good safety record (one non-injury fall). It was accepted as a new way of working across rehabilitation disciplines as an 'extra layer of therapy'. NROL had perceived advantages in terms of patient and staff resource (e.g. saving time, energy and travel). NROL provided staffing efficiencies (ratio 0.6) compared to one-to-one delivery. Technology difficulties and reluctance were surmountable with dedicated technology assistance. Leadership commitment was considered key to enable the efforts needed for implementation and sustained use.

Conclusion: Pragmatic implementation of group-based telerehabilitation was possible as an adjunct to neurological rehabilitation within an existing healthcare system. The compelling advantages reported of having NROL as part of rehabilitation supports the continued use of this telerehabilitation approach. This project provides an exemplar of how evaluation can be run concurrently with implementation, applying a data driven rather than anecdotal approach to implementation.

Keywords: Brain injury; Mixed methods; Neurological; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Telerehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mixed methods convergent parallel design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
NROL participation profile
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Joint display merging mixed methods data
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Assembly . Digital health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
    1. World Health Assembly . eHealth. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
    1. Taylor A, Caffery LJ, Gesesew HA, King A, Bassal AR, Ford K, et al. How Australian Health Care Services Adapted to Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of Telehealth Professionals. Front Public Health. 2021;9:648009. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.648009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crotty M, Killington M, van den Berg M, Morris C, Taylor A, Carati C. Telerehabilitation for older people using off-the-shelf applications: acceptability and feasibility. J Telemed Telecare. 2014;20(7):370–376. doi: 10.1177/1357633X14552382. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hollander JE, Sites F. The Transition from Reimagining to Recreating Health Care Is Now. Nejm Catalyst Innov Care Deliv. 2020.