Prognostic analysis of patients with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer treated by surgery
- PMID: 37344912
- PMCID: PMC10283242
- DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03076-9
Prognostic analysis of patients with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer treated by surgery
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the most common gynaecologic malignancies. The prognosis of stage IIIC1p cervical cancer patients treated by surgery is heterogeneous. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the factors influencing the prognosis in such patients.
Methods: From January 2012 to December 2017, 102 patients with cervical cancer who underwent surgical treatment in the Department of Gynaecology and Tumours, Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, and had pelvic lymph node metastasis confirmed by pathology were analysed retrospectively. All patients underwent radical hysterectomy with/without oophorectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy with/without para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Clinical data was collected including age, surgical method, ovarian status, intraoperative blood loss, perioperative complications, tumour size, pathological type, depth of stromal invasion (DSI), whether the lymphatic vascular space was infiltrated, number of pelvic lymph node metastases, location of pelvic lymph node metastases, total number of lymph nodes resected, lymph node ratio (LNR), nature of vaginal margin, whether parametrium was involved, postoperative adjuvant therapy, preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and prognostic information of patients. Survival curves for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference between the survival curves was tested using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate COX regression models were used to assess the factors associated with overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer. Nomogram plots were constructed to predict OS and DFS, and the predictive accuracy of the nomograms was measured by Harrell's C-index and calibration curves.
Results: A total of 102 patients with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer were included in the study, and the median follow-up time was 63 months (range from 6 to 130 months). The 5-year OS was 64.7%, and the 5-year DFS was 62.7%. Multivariate analysis showed that no postoperative adjuvant therapy, LNR > 0.3 and NLR > 3.8 were independent risk factors for OS and DFS in patients with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer.
Conclusions: Patients with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer have a poor prognosis. Lower OS and DFS were associated with no postoperative adjuvant therapy, LNR > 0.3 and NLR > 3.8.
Keywords: Cervical cancer; Disease-free survival; Overall survival; Prognosis; Stage IIIC1p.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures




Similar articles
-
[Outcomes and prognosis of radical surgery in patients with stageⅠb2 and Ⅱa2 cervical squamous cell carcinoma].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022 May 25;57(5):361-369. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20220326-00194. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022. PMID: 35658327 Chinese.
-
[Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):894-901. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015. PMID: 26887872 Chinese.
-
Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jul;40(5):699-704. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1652888. Epub 2019 Oct 12. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020. PMID: 31607197
-
Primary malignant melanoma of the cervix: A comprehensive analysis of case reports in the Chinese population.Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(13):14052-14061. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6054. Epub 2023 May 10. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 37162314 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Different surgical methods of hysterectomy for the management of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 15;14:1524991. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1524991. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39882446 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the prognostic relevance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2024 Dec 23;14:1461175. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1461175. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39763608 Free PMC article.
-
The prognostic values of lymph node ratio for gynecological cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 1;14:1475348. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1475348. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39411125 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of integrating surgical interventions with chemoradiotherapy in managing stage IIIC cervical cancer.Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):4351-4361. doi: 10.62347/GLOU3149. eCollection 2025. Am J Transl Res. 2025. PMID: 40672579 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic analysis of stage IIIC1p cervical cancer patients.Front Oncol. 2024 Apr 25;14:1362281. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1362281. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38725620 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cibula D, Pötter R, Planchamp F, Avall-Lundqvist E, Fischerova D, Haie Meder C, et al. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Cervical Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018;28(4):641–655. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001216. - DOI - PubMed
-
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network . NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Cervical Cancer (Version I.2018) National Comprehensive Cancer Network. PA, USA: Plymouth Meeting; 2017.
-
- Pecorino B, D'Agate MG, Scibilia G, Scollo P, Giannini A, Di Donna MC, et al. Evaluation of surgical outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy and total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a retrospective analysis of data collected before the LACC trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(20):13176. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013176. - DOI - PMC - PubMed