Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 10;15(10):2698.
doi: 10.3390/cancers15102698.

Characterization and Optimization of the Tumor Microenvironment in Patient-Derived Organotypic Slices and Organoid Models of Glioblastoma

Affiliations

Characterization and Optimization of the Tumor Microenvironment in Patient-Derived Organotypic Slices and Organoid Models of Glioblastoma

Vera Nickl et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

While glioblastoma (GBM) is still challenging to treat, novel immunotherapeutic approaches have shown promising effects in preclinical settings. However, their clinical breakthrough is hampered by complex interactions of GBM with the tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we present an analysis of TME composition in a patient-derived organoid model (PDO) as well as in organotypic slice cultures (OSC). To obtain a more realistic model for immunotherapeutic testing, we introduce an enhanced PDO model. We manufactured PDOs and OSCs from fresh tissue of GBM patients and analyzed the TME. Enhanced PDOs (ePDOs) were obtained via co-culture with PBMCs (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) and compared to normal PDOs (nPDOs) and PT (primary tissue). At first, we showed that TME was not sustained in PDOs after a short time of culture. In contrast, TME was largely maintained in OSCs. Unfortunately, OSCs can only be cultured for up to 9 days. Thus, we enhanced the TME in PDOs by co-culturing PDOs and PBMCs from healthy donors. These cellular TME patterns could be preserved until day 21. The ePDO approach could mirror the interaction of GBM, TME and immunotherapeutic agents and may consequently represent a realistic model for individual immunotherapeutic drug testing in the future.

Keywords: glioblastoma; organoids; slice culture; tumormicroenvironment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relative expression of tumor microenvironment (TME) cells in primary tissue (PT). n = 10 patients. The relative expression of antigen patterns in GBM is given in [%]; PT is displayed in bar plots; whiskers indicate standard deviation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Alteration of TME cell presence over time in PT and in patient-derived organoids (PDOs) at day 7 and 14 of culture. n = 9 patients. The relative expression of cellular TME components [%] was quantified in PT (blue) and at day 7 (violet) and day 14 (green) of PDO culture: (A) CD45, (B) CD7, (C) CD4, (D) CD8, (E) CD14, (F) CD68, (G) iNOS, (H) CD163, (I) CCR2, (J) CD25, (K) PD1, (L) FOXP3, (M) TIM3, (N) LAG3; Whiskers indicate standard deviation; significant differences are indicated.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of representative immunohistochemical images for the TME composition in PT and in PDO day 7 and PDO day 14 (patient 6, Scale bar: 50 µm, magnification 40×).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of representative immunohistochemical images for the TME composition in PT and in PDO day 7 and PDO day 14 (patient 6, Scale bar: 50 µm, magnification 40×).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Alteration of TME cell marker abundance over time in organotypic slice culture (OSC) on day 1 to day 9 of culture. n = 5 patients. The relative expression of cellular TME components [%] was quantified from day 0 to day 9 of culture: (A) CD45, (B) CD7, (C) CD4, (D) CD8, (E) CD14, (F) CD68, (G) iNOS, (H) CD163, (I) CCR2, (J) CD25, (K) PD1, (L) FOXP3, (M) TIM3, (N) LAG3. No significant differences between day 0 and day 9 could be shown in antigen expression; Whiskers indicate standard deviation; significant differences are indicated.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Example of representative immunohistochemical images for the TME composition in OSCs on day 1, day 2, day 4 and day 7 of culture (patient 5, Scale bar: 50 µm, magnification 40×).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Example of representative immunohistochemical images for the TME composition in OSCs on day 1, day 2, day 4 and day 7 of culture (patient 5, Scale bar: 50 µm, magnification 40×).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Expression of cellular TME markers in normal PDOs (nPDOs) and enhanced PDOs (ePDOs) at day 0, 7, 14 and 21 compared to PT. n = 3 patients. The relative expression of cellular TME components [%] was quantified in PT (blue) and at day 7 (green), day 14 (orange) and day 21 (red) of PDO culture in nPDOs and ePDOs: (A) CD45, (B) CD7, (C) CD4, (D) CD8, (E) CD14, (F) CD68, (G) iNOS, (H) CD163; Whiskers indicate standard deviation; significant differences are indicated.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Example of representative immunohistochemical images for the TME in PT, in ePDO and nPDO (patient 13, Scale bar: 50 µm, magnification 40×).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Example of representative immunohistochemical images for the TME in PT, in ePDO and nPDO (patient 13, Scale bar: 50 µm, magnification 40×).

References

    1. Robert Koch Institut Zentrum Für Krebsregisterdaten. [(accessed on 23 April 2023)]. Available online: https://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/DE/Home/homepage_node.html.
    1. Stupp R., Mason W.P., van den Bent M.J., Weller M., Fisher B., Taphoorn M.J.B., Belanger K., Brandes A.A., Marosi C., Bogdahn U., et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:987–996. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herrlinger U., Tzaridis T., Mack F., Steinbach J.P., Schlegel U., Sabel M., Hau P., Kortmann R.-D., Krex D., Grauer O., et al. Lomustine-temozolomide combination therapy versus standard temozolomide therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CeTeG/NOA-09): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393:678–688. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31791-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rehman A.A., Elmore K.B., Mattei T.A. The effects of alternating electric fields in glioblastoma: Current evidence on therapeutic mechanisms and clinical outcomes. Neurosurg. Focus. 2015;38:E14. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.FOCUS14742. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diaz R.J., Ali S., Qadir M.G., De La Fuente M.I., Ivan M.E., Komotar R.J. The role of bevacizumab in the treatment of glioblastoma. J. Neurooncol. 2017;133:455–467. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2477-x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources