Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug;16(8):1309-1322.
doi: 10.1111/cts.13548. Epub 2023 Jun 21.

DNA methyltransferase inhibitor exposure-response: Challenges and opportunities

Affiliations
Review

DNA methyltransferase inhibitor exposure-response: Challenges and opportunities

Amanda B Kagan et al. Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Although DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTis), such as azacitidine and decitabine, are used extensively in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia, there remain unanswered questions about DNMTi's mechanism of action and predictors of clinical response. Because patients often remain on single-agent DNMTis or DNMTi-containing regimens for several months before knowing whether clinical benefit can be achieved, the development and clinical validation of response-predictive biomarkers represents an important unmet need in oncology. In this review, we will summarize the clinical studies that led to the approval of azacitidine and decitabine, as well as the real-world experience with these drugs. We will then focus on biomarker development for DNMTis-specifically, efforts at determining exposure-response relationships and challenges that remain impacting the broader clinical translation of these methods. We will highlight recent progress in liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry technology that has allowed for the simultaneous measurement of decitabine genomic incorporation and global DNA methylation, which has significant potential as a mechanism-of-action based biomarker in patients on DNMTis. Last, we will cover important research questions that need to be addressed in order to optimize this potential biomarker for clinical use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Nicole M. Anders, Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian, and Michelle A. Rudek are inventors on the patent for Quantitative Determination of Nucleoside Analogue Drugs in Genomic DNA or RNA (US Patent 11,035,850 B2; expiration April 10, 2037). Amanda B. Kagan, Dominique A. Garrison, Nicole M. Anders, Jonathan A. Webster, and Sharyn D. Baker declare no competing interests for this work.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Membrane transport, metabolism, and mechanism of action of azacitidine and decitabine. Azacitidine and decitabine enter the cells via concentrative nucleoside transporters (SLC 28A or 22A). The equilibrative nucleoside transporter (SLC 29A) mediate the entrance or export depending on the concentration gradient. Once inside the cell, azacitidine (5‐AZA) and decitabine (5‐AZA‐dC) are phosphorylated by a series of kinases, ultimately to 5‐azacytidine triphosphate (5‐AZA‐CTP) and 5‐aza‐2′‐deoxycytidine triphosphate (5‐AZA‐dCTP). Both 5‐AZA and 5‐AZA‐dC undergo deamination by cytidine deaminase (CDA). Ten to 20% of 5‐azacytidine diphosphate (5‐AZA‐CDP) is converted to 5‐aza‐2′‐deoxycytidine diphosphate (5‐AZA‐dCDP) by ribonucleotide reductase. 5‐AZA‐CTP is incorporated into RNA, leading to protein biosynthesis disruption and apoptosis. 5‐AZA‐dCTP is incorporated into DNA, leading to trapping and degradation of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) enzymes, passive loss of DNA methylation, and ultimately differentiation and expression of tumor suppressive genes (TSGs). Particularly when DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTis) are given at higher doses, DNA incorporation and trapping of DNMT enzymes can lead to DNA damage and apoptosis. Created with BioRender.com.

References

    1. Saygin C, Carraway HE. Current and emerging strategies for management of myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood Rev. 2021;48:100791. doi:10.1016/j.blre.2020.100791 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheson BD, Greenberg PL, Bennett JM, et al. Clinical application and proposal for modification of the international working group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. Blood. 2006;108:419‐425. doi:10.1182/blood-2005-10-4149 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Itzykson R, Thepot S, Quesnel B, et al. Prognostic factors for response and overall survival in 282 patients with higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated with azacitidine. Blood. 2011;117:403‐411. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-06-289280 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Komrokji RS, Al Ali NH, Sallman D, et al. Validation of international working group response criteria in higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a report on behalf of the MDS clinical research consortium. Cancer Med. 2021;10:447‐453. doi:10.1002/cam4.3608 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim N, Pavletic S, Norsworthy KJ. Meaningful response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 2022;196:1137‐1148. doi:10.1111/bjh.17838 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types