Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;104(10):465-476.
doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 May 20.

Characterization of high-grade prostate cancer at multiparametric MRI using a radiomic-based computer-aided diagnosis system as standalone and second reader

Affiliations
Free article

Characterization of high-grade prostate cancer at multiparametric MRI using a radiomic-based computer-aided diagnosis system as standalone and second reader

Tristan Jaouen et al. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2023 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and test across various scanners a zone-specific region-of-interest (ROI)-based computer-aided diagnosis system (CAD) aimed at characterizing, on MRI, International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade≥2 prostate cancers.

Materials and methods: ROI-based quantitative models were selected in multi-vendor training (265 pre-prostatectomy MRIs) and pre-test (112 pre-biopsy MRIs) datasets. The best peripheral and transition zone models were combined and retrospectively assessed in internal (158 pre-biopsy MRIs) and external (104 pre-biopsy MRIs) test datasets. Two radiologists (R1/R2) retrospectively delineated the lesions targeted at biopsy in test datasets. The CAD area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for characterizing ISUP≥2 cancers was compared to that of the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version2 (PI-RADSv2) score prospectively assigned to targeted lesions.

Results: The best models used the 25th apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) percentile in transition zone and the 2nd ADC percentile and normalized wash-in rate in peripheral zone. The PI-RADSv2 AUCs were 82% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 74-87) and 86% (95% CI: 81-91) in the internal and external test datasets respectively. They were not different from the CAD AUCs obtained with R1 and R2 delineations, in the internal (82% [95% CI: 76-89], P = 0.95 and 85% [95% CI: 78-91], P = 0.55) and external (82% [95% CI: 74-91], P = 0.41 and 86% [95% CI:78-95], P = 0.98) test datasets. The CAD yielded sensitivities of 86-89% and 90-91%, and specificities of 64-65% and 69-75% in the internal and external test datasets respectively.

Conclusion: The CAD performance for characterizing ISUP grade≥2 prostate cancers on MRI is not different from that of PI-RADSv2 score across two test datasets.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Computer-assisted diagnosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostatic neoplasms; Validation study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest Olivier Rouvière, Rémi Souchon, Tristan Jaouen, Au Hoang Dinh and Christelle Gonindard-Melodelima are inventors on international patent application PCT/EP2022/061221 "System for helping diagnosing aggressive prostate cancers and related method" that protects the algorithm described in this article.