Assessment of self-report response bias in high functioning autistic people
- PMID: 37346057
- PMCID: PMC10281395
- DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2021.2006097
Assessment of self-report response bias in high functioning autistic people
Abstract
The study aimed to establish a normative data set for the Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS) and Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomology (SIMS) in a community adult sample of high functioning autistic (HFA) people. Assessments were administered anonymously online. Seventy surveys were completed, with respondents contributing from 16 countries. The majority of subscales and total scores for the PDS and SIMS fell above cut-off for self-report response bias, suggesting that completion of these measures by HFA individuals may lead to conclusions of intentional response distortion, even when this is not the case. Significant relationships were found between high scores and education level, as well as psychological distress. The findings of the study raise concerns about the use of these measures with HFA people, particularly in 'high stakes' situations.
Keywords: high functioning autism; impression management; malingering; response bias; socially desirable responding.
© 2022 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.
Conflict of interest statement
Marilyn A. Sher has declared no conflicts of interest Caroline Oliver has declared no conflicts of interest The authors did not receive any financial support from any organisation for the submitted work. The first author was a student at the University of Birmingham, and the study was undertaken as part of a practitioner doctorate. The second author works for the University of Birmingham and is the course director. The second author supervised the study as part of the doctorate. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Similar articles
-
The utility of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology for distinguishing individuals with Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) from DID simulators and healthy controls.Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Nov 19;12(1):1984048. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1984048. eCollection 2021. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021. PMID: 34868478 Free PMC article.
-
Positive response distortion by police officer applicants: association of Paulhus Deception Scales With MMPI-2 and Inwald Personality Inventory Validity Scales.Assessment. 2008 Mar;15(1):87-96. doi: 10.1177/1073191107306082. Assessment. 2008. PMID: 18258735
-
To thine own self, be true: Examining change in self-reported alcohol measures over time as related to socially desirable responding bias among people with unhealthy alcohol use.Subst Abus. 2021;42(1):87-93. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1697998. Epub 2020 Feb 10. Subst Abus. 2021. PMID: 32040383 Clinical Trial.
-
Do impression management and self-deception distort self-report measures with content of dynamic risk factors in offender samples? A meta-analytic review.Int J Law Psychiatry. 2018 May-Jun;58:157-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Apr 27. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2018. PMID: 29853006 Review.
-
[ADI-R and ADOS and the differential diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders: Interests, limits and openings].Encephale. 2019 Nov;45(5):441-448. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Sep 5. Encephale. 2019. PMID: 31495549 Review. French.
References
-
- Ali, S. (2018). Autistic spectrum disorder and offending behaviour – a brief review of the literature. Advances in Autism, 4(3), 109–121. 10.1108/AIA-05-2018-0015 - DOI
-
- Archer, R. P., Wheeler, E. M. A., & Vauter, R. A. (2016). Empirically Supported Forensic Assessment. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23(4), 348–364. 10.1111/cpsp.12171 - DOI
-
- Attwood, T. (2015). The complete guide to Asperger’s syndrome. Jessica Kingsley Publ.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous