Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Prism Adaptation in Art Constructive Errors in Painting
- PMID: 37346871
- PMCID: PMC10279982
- DOI: 10.32598/bcn.2021.2207.1
Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Prism Adaptation in Art Constructive Errors in Painting
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the influence of neglect and the effect of prism adaptation (PA) combined with continuous Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS) on the art constructive errors in painting rehabilitation of stroke patients with neglect.
Methods: Fourteen patients with neglect and art constructive errors in painting secondary to stroke were randomly assigned to the rehabilitation group and received PA combined with the inhibitory protocol of cTBS over the intact parietal cortex; the control group received PA combined with sham cTBS for two weeks in ten daily sessions. Patients were assessed for art constructive errors in painting in figure copying test (FCT), and coloring test (CT) before and after the intervention. Art constructive errors in painting were classified into omission, deformation, size, neglect of warm colors, and perseveration of errors. Neglect was evaluated using the line bisection task (LBT), figure copying test (FCT), and coloring test (CT).
Results: All patients showed a significant improvement in art constructive errors in painting (measured using the pattern of painting' errors in FCT and CT), and neglect (measured using LBT, FCT, and CT) (P<0.05). Omission, neglect of warm colors, and deformation were the most frequent errors.
Conclusion: Neglect and rehabilitation influence the painting system in stroke patients. Both approaches improved art constructive errors in painting and neglect symptoms.
Keywords: Brain stimulation; Coloring; Neglect; Painting; Prism; Rehabilitation.
Copyright© 2023 Iranian Neuroscience Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
The Effect of Continuous Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Prism Adaptation on the Neglect Recovery in Stroke Patients.J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Nov;28(11):104296. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.07.012. Epub 2019 Aug 6. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019. PMID: 31395425 Clinical Trial.
-
Theta burst stimulation in neglect after stroke: functional outcome and response variability origins.Brain. 2019 Apr 1;142(4):992-1008. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz029. Brain. 2019. PMID: 30783648 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term effects of continuous theta-burst stimulation in visuospatial neglect.J Int Med Res. 2015 Apr;43(2):196-203. doi: 10.1177/0300060513498663. Epub 2015 Jan 14. J Int Med Res. 2015. PMID: 25589237 Clinical Trial.
-
Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of unilateral neglect in stroke patients: A systematic review and best evidence synthesis.Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2021;39(6):447-465. doi: 10.3233/RNN-211228. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34864705 Free PMC article.
-
Neglect and prism adaptation: a new therapeutic tool for spatial cognition disorders.Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006;24(4-6):347-56. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006. PMID: 17119309 Review.
Cited by
-
Does repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation have a beneficial effect on improving unilateral spatial neglect caused by stroke? A meta-analysis.J Neurol. 2024 Oct;271(10):6494-6507. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12612-w. Epub 2024 Aug 28. J Neurol. 2024. PMID: 39196395 Free PMC article.
-
A case report of changes in asymmetric colour use in paintings produced over 3 years post-stroke by a patient with spatial neglect.Commun Psychol. 2025 Mar 26;3(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00226-5. Commun Psychol. 2025. PMID: 40140487 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous