Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 1;64(2):ezad240.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad240.

Impact of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on 10-year mortality versus percutaneous coronary intervention

Collaborators, Affiliations

Impact of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on 10-year mortality versus percutaneous coronary intervention

Shigetaka Kageyama et al. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Objectives: The very long-term mortality of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a randomized complex coronary artery disease population is unknown. This study aims to investigate the impact of on-pump and off-pump CABG versus PCI on 10-year all-cause mortality.

Methods: The SYNTAX trial randomized 1800 patients with three-vessel and/or left main coronary artery disease to PCI or CABG and assessed their survival at 10 years. In this sub-study, the hazard of mortality over 10 years was compared according to the technique of revascularization: on-pump CABG (n = 725), off-pump CABG (n = 128) and PCI (n = 903).

Results: There was substantial inter-site variation in the use of off-pump CABG despite baseline characteristics being largely homogeneous among the 3 groups. The crude rate of mortality was significantly lower following on-pump CABG versus PCI [25.6% vs 28.4%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.96], while it was comparable between off-pump CABG and PCI (28.5% vs 28.4%, HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.69-1.40). After adjusting for the 9 variables included in the SYNTAX score II 2020, 10-year mortality remained significantly lower with on-pump CABG than PCI (HR 0.75 against PCI, P = 0.009).

Conclusions: In the SYNTAXES trial, 10-year mortality adjusted for major confounders was significantly lower following on-pump CABG compared to PCI. There was no evidence for unadjusted difference between off-pump CABG and PCI, although the unadjusted estimated HR had a wide CI. Site heterogeneity in the technique used in bypass surgery has had measurable effects on treatment performance.

Keywords: Complex coronary artery disease; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Revascularization; Ten-year mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Study flowchart illustration. The sample size for the comparator groups analysed for the primary analysis was reduced slightly due to missingness in a small proportion of baseline variables used in the adjusted model. CABG: coronary artery bypass grafts; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Region disparity of on-pump and off-pump in SYNTAX trial. Patient number of the on-pump and off-pump CABG per institute stratified by country and region. In 4 centres with only 1 or 2 patients recruited, there was no allocation to the CABG arm as per randomization. CABG: coronary artery bypass graft.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Crude and adjusted survival curve of 10-year mortality. (A) Crude survival curve of 10-year mortality. Image (A) shows rude Kaplan–Meier mortality curves in 3 groups (on-pump CABG, off-pump CABG and PCI). (B) Inverse probability weighting-adjusted survival curves of on-pump CABG and PCI. Image (B) shows inverse probability weighting-adjusted survival curves of on-pump CABG and PCI. CABG: coronary artery bypass grafts; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EF: ejection fraction; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention.
None

Comment in

References

    1. Gaudino M, Angelini GD, Antoniades C, Bakaeen F, Benedetto U, Calafiore AM. et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: 30 years of debate. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e009934. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deppe AC, Arbash W, Kuhn EW, Slottosch I, Scherner M, Liakopoulos OJ. et al. Current evidence of coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump versus on-pump: a systematic review with meta-analysis of over 16 900 patients investigated in randomized controlled trials. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;49:1031–41; discussion 1041. - PubMed
    1. Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Bakaeen F, Rahouma M, Tam DY, Abouarab A. et al. Off- versus on-pump coronary surgery and the effect of follow-up length and surgeons' experience: a meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e010034. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shroyer AL, Hattler B, Wagner TH, Collins JF, Baltz JH, Quin JA. et al.; Veterans Affairs ROOBY-FS Group. Five-year outcomes after on-pump and off-pump coronary-artery bypass. New Engl J Med 2017;377:623–32. - PubMed
    1. Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, Taggart DP, Hu SS, Straka Z. et al.; CORONARY Investigators. Five-year outcomes after off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting. New Engl J Med 2016;375:2359–68. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources