Impact of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on 10-year mortality versus percutaneous coronary intervention
- PMID: 37348857
- PMCID: PMC10693439
- DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad240
Impact of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on 10-year mortality versus percutaneous coronary intervention
Abstract
Objectives: The very long-term mortality of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a randomized complex coronary artery disease population is unknown. This study aims to investigate the impact of on-pump and off-pump CABG versus PCI on 10-year all-cause mortality.
Methods: The SYNTAX trial randomized 1800 patients with three-vessel and/or left main coronary artery disease to PCI or CABG and assessed their survival at 10 years. In this sub-study, the hazard of mortality over 10 years was compared according to the technique of revascularization: on-pump CABG (n = 725), off-pump CABG (n = 128) and PCI (n = 903).
Results: There was substantial inter-site variation in the use of off-pump CABG despite baseline characteristics being largely homogeneous among the 3 groups. The crude rate of mortality was significantly lower following on-pump CABG versus PCI [25.6% vs 28.4%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.96], while it was comparable between off-pump CABG and PCI (28.5% vs 28.4%, HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.69-1.40). After adjusting for the 9 variables included in the SYNTAX score II 2020, 10-year mortality remained significantly lower with on-pump CABG than PCI (HR 0.75 against PCI, P = 0.009).
Conclusions: In the SYNTAXES trial, 10-year mortality adjusted for major confounders was significantly lower following on-pump CABG compared to PCI. There was no evidence for unadjusted difference between off-pump CABG and PCI, although the unadjusted estimated HR had a wide CI. Site heterogeneity in the technique used in bypass surgery has had measurable effects on treatment performance.
Keywords: Complex coronary artery disease; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Revascularization; Ten-year mortality.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
Figures




Comment in
-
The never-ending story: on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term survival.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Aug 1;64(2):ezad269. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad269. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023. PMID: 37522879 No abstract available.
References
-
- Deppe AC, Arbash W, Kuhn EW, Slottosch I, Scherner M, Liakopoulos OJ. et al. Current evidence of coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump versus on-pump: a systematic review with meta-analysis of over 16 900 patients investigated in randomized controlled trials. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;49:1031–41; discussion 1041. - PubMed
-
- Shroyer AL, Hattler B, Wagner TH, Collins JF, Baltz JH, Quin JA. et al.; Veterans Affairs ROOBY-FS Group. Five-year outcomes after on-pump and off-pump coronary-artery bypass. New Engl J Med 2017;377:623–32. - PubMed
-
- Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, Taggart DP, Hu SS, Straka Z. et al.; CORONARY Investigators. Five-year outcomes after off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting. New Engl J Med 2016;375:2359–68. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous