Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 22;23(1):674.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09683-2.

Educational differences in healthcare use among survivors after breast, prostate, lung, and colon cancer - a SEQUEL cohort study

Affiliations

Educational differences in healthcare use among survivors after breast, prostate, lung, and colon cancer - a SEQUEL cohort study

Anne Katrine Graudal Levinsen et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Many cancer survivors experience late effects after cancer. Comorbidity, health literacy, late effects, and help-seeking behavior may affect healthcare use and may differ among socioeconomic groups. We examined healthcare use among cancer survivors, compared with cancer-free individuals, and investigated educational differences in healthcare use among cancer survivors.

Methods: A Danish cohort of 127,472 breast, prostate, lung, and colon cancer survivors from the national cancer databases, and 637,258 age- and sex-matched cancer-free individuals was established. Date of entry was 12 months after diagnosis/index date (for cancer-free individuals). Follow-up ended at death, emigration, new primary cancer, December 31st, 2018, or up to 10 years. Information about education and healthcare use, defined as the number of consultations with general practitioner (GP), private practicing specialists (PPS), hospital, and acute healthcare contacts 1-9 years after diagnosis/index date, was extracted from national registers. We used Poisson regression models to compare healthcare use between cancer survivors and cancer-free individuals, and to investigate the association between education and healthcare use among cancer survivors.

Results: Cancer survivors had more GP, hospital, and acute healthcare contacts than cancer-free individuals, while the use of PPS were alike. One-to-four-year survivors with short compared to long education had more GP consultations (breast, rate ratios (RR) = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.25-1.30; prostate, RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.10-1.18; lung, RR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.13-1.23; and colon cancer, RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.13-1.22) and acute contacts (breast, RR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.26-1.45; prostate, RR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.15-1.38; lung, RR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.16-1.33; and colon cancer, RR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.14-1.60), even after adjusting for comorbidity. One-to-four-year survivors with short compared to long education had less consultations with PPS, while no association was observed for hospital contacts.

Conclusion: Cancer survivors used more healthcare than cancer-free individuals. Cancer survivors with short education had more GP and acute healthcare contacts than survivors with long education. To optimize healthcare use after cancer, we need to better understand survivors' healthcare-seeking behaviors and their specific needs, especially among survivors with short education.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Colon cancer; Healthcare use; Lung cancer; Prostate cancer; Social inequality; Survivorship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Population flowchart including 1-9-year Danish survivors of breast, prostate, lung, colon cancer, and cancer-free individuals
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean cumulative number of GP consultations and hospital contacts for cancer survivors and cancer-free individuals. Note that x-axis is not the same
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
RRs of GP, hospital, acute, and PPS contacts among 1-4-year-CS with short versus long education. Long education is the reference for all analyses. All analyses are adjusted for age, sex (except prostate and breast cancer survivor populations), time since diagnosis, year of diagnosis, cohabitations status, comorbidity, and stage. RR, rate ratio; GP, general practitioner; PPS, private practicing specialist; CS, cancer survivors; CI, confidence intervals. Note that x-axis is not the same

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bluethmann SM, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH. Anticipating the “Silver Tsunami”: Prevalence Trajectories and Comorbidity Burden among Older Cancer Survivors in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(7):1029–36. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0133. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shapiro CL. Cancer Survivorship. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(25):2438–50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1712502. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kjaer TK, Andersen EAW, Winther JF, Bidstrup PE, Borre M, Møller H, et al. Long-term somatic disease risk in adult danish Cancer survivors. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(4):537–45. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.7192. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peuckmann VP, Ekholm O, Sjogren P, Rasmussen NK, Christiansen P, Moller S, et al. Health care utilisation and characteristics of long-term breast cancer survivors: nationwide survey in Denmark. Eur J cancer (Oxford England: 1990) 2009;45(4):625–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.09.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Treanor C, Santin O, Mills M, Donnelly M. Cancer survivors with self-reported late effects: their health status, care needs and service utilisation. Psycho-oncology. 2013;22(11):2428–35. doi: 10.1002/pon.3304. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources