Characterizing Disparities in the Treatment of Intimate Partner Violence
- PMID: 37350922
- PMCID: PMC10283094
Characterizing Disparities in the Treatment of Intimate Partner Violence
Abstract
Exposure to Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) has lasting adverse effects on the physical, behavioral, cognitive, and emotional health of survivors. To this end, it is critical to understand the effectiveness of IPV treatment strategies in reducing IPV and its debilitating effects. Meta-analyses designed to comprehensively describe the effectiveness of treatments offer unique advantages. However, the heterogeneity within and between studies poses challenges in interpreting findings. Meta-analyses are therefore unlikely to identify the factors that underlie disparities in treatment efficacy. To characterize the effect of demographic and social factors on treatment effectiveness, we develop a comprehensive computational and statistical framework that uses Meta-regression to characterize the effect of demographic and social variables on treatment outcomes. The innovations in our methodology include (i) standardization of outcome variables to enable meaningful comparisons among studies, and (ii) two parallel meta-regression pipelines to reliably handle missing data.
©2023 AMIA - All rights reserved.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Technology-based and digital interventions for intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 27;18(3):e1271. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1271. eCollection 2022 Sep. Campbell Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36909881 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The association between life satisfaction, emotional support, and perceived health among women who experienced intimate Partner violence (IPV) - 2007 behavioral risk factor surveillance system.BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;21(1):641. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10665-4. BMC Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33794819 Free PMC article.
-
Does exposure to interparental violence increase women's risk of intimate partner violence? Evidence from Nigeria demographic and health survey.BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018 Jan 11;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12914-018-0143-9. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018. PMID: 29325549 Free PMC article.
-
Intimate partner violence against married and cohabiting women in sub-Saharan Africa: does sexual autonomy matter?Reprod Health. 2022 Mar 28;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01382-1. Reprod Health. 2022. PMID: 35346246 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of informal supporters of intimate partner violence survivors: the intimate partner violence model of informal supporter readiness.PeerJ. 2023 May 9;11:e15160. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15160. eCollection 2023. PeerJ. 2023. PMID: 37187522 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Breiding M, Basile KC, Smith SG, Black MC, Mahendra RR. Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Version 2.0. 2015
-
- Basile KC, Black MC, Breiding MJ, Chen J, Merrick MT, Smith SG, et al. National intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. 2011
-
- Oram S, Fisher HL, Minnis H, Seedat S, Walby S, Hegarty K, et al. The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on intimate partner violence and mental health: advancing mental health services, research, and policy. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(6):487–524. - PubMed
-
- Cunradi CB, Caetano R, Clark C, Schafer J. Neighborhood poverty as a predictor of intimate partner violence among White, Black, and Hispanic couples in the United States: A multilevel analysis. Annals of epidemiology. 2000;10(5):297–308. - PubMed
-
- Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence against women. 2000;6(2):142–61.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources