Effects of fixed functional orthodontic treatment in hypodivergent and hyperdivergent class II patients-a retrospective cephalometric investigation
- PMID: 37351654
- PMCID: PMC10415434
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05105-z
Effects of fixed functional orthodontic treatment in hypodivergent and hyperdivergent class II patients-a retrospective cephalometric investigation
Abstract
Objective: To compare skeletal and dentoalveolar changes after orthodontic treatment of class II malocclusion in patients with hypodivergent and hyperdivergent growth patterns through cast splint fixed functional appliances (FFA).
Materials and methods: N = 42 out of n = 47 patients with mandibular plane angles < 34° or ≥ 34° were divided into a hypodivergent (n = 24) and a hyperdivergent (n = 18) group. All patients received a single-step mandibular advancement protocol through an FFA. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed after initial leveling and alignment (T1) and immediately after FFA removal (T2). The therapeutic effect was calculated through comparison with age-matched controls from a growth survey. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results: Hypodivergent and hyperdivergent patients showed different treatment outcomes, but significant differences existed only for overbite and interincisal angle. Nearly all measurements suggested similar treatment-related changes for both groups with exception for dentoalveolar parameters.
Conclusion: Treatment with FFA causes similar skeletal and dentoalveolar effects in hypodivergent and in hyperdivergent patients. The correction of overjet and molar relationship is mainly caused by dentoalveolar changes.
Clinical relevance: Hyperdivergent patients do not respond unfavorably to FFA treatment compared to hypodivergent patients. Lower incisor protrusion occurs more pronounced in hypodivergent patients. The growth pattern ought to be considered when choosing FFA for class II treatment.
Keywords: FMA; Fixed functional appliance; Herbst; Hyperdivergent; Hypodivergent.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures

Similar articles
-
A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance.Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jan;22(1):293-304. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2111-5. Epub 2017 Apr 1. Clin Oral Investig. 2018. PMID: 28365810
-
Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Nov;150(5):818-830. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.020. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27871709
-
Treatment changes of hypo- and hyperdivergent Class II Herbst patients.Angle Orthod. 2018 Jan;88(1):3-9. doi: 10.2319/060117-369.1. Epub 2017 Oct 10. Angle Orthod. 2018. PMID: 29016191 Free PMC article.
-
Angle class II correction: stepwise mandibular advancement or bite jumping? : A systematic review and meta-analysis of skeletal, dental and condylar effects.J Orofac Orthop. 2020 Jul;81(4):286-300. doi: 10.1007/s00056-020-00226-6. Epub 2020 May 20. J Orofac Orthop. 2020. PMID: 32435862 English.
-
Mandibular propulsion appliance for adults with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Orthod. 2020 Apr 1;42(2):163-173. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz089. Eur J Orthod. 2020. PMID: 31786599
Cited by
-
CBCT analysis of mandibular position and bilateral symmetry in adult female patients with a deep overbite before and after flat bite plate treatment: a retrospective study.Eur J Med Res. 2024 Nov 16;29(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02130-w. Eur J Med Res. 2024. PMID: 39548516 Free PMC article.
-
Expert consensus on orthodontic treatment of protrusive facial deformities.Int J Oral Sci. 2025 Feb 1;17(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41368-024-00338-4. Int J Oral Sci. 2025. PMID: 39890790 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reliability of Zagreb 82 MOD Cephalometric Assessment in Determining the Facial Growth Pattern.Acta Stomatol Croat. 2025 Mar;59(1):36-43. doi: 10.15644/asc59/1/4. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2025. PMID: 40225826 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Moyers RE. Handbook of orthodontics. Chicago: Year Book Med Publishers; 1988.
-
- Pancherz H, Ruf S. The Herbst appliance: research-based clinical mangement. Chicago: Quintessence; 2008.
-
- Hourfar J, Ludwig B, Ruf S, Kinzinger G, Lisson J. Fixed treatment of retroposition of the mandible - a literature review. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop. 2012;44:183–192.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous