Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287653.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287653. eCollection 2023.

Development of a discrete choice experiment questionnaire to elicit preferences by pregnant women and policymakers for the expansion of non-invasive prenatal screening

Affiliations
Review

Development of a discrete choice experiment questionnaire to elicit preferences by pregnant women and policymakers for the expansion of non-invasive prenatal screening

Hung Manh Nguyen et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: An instrument for measuring intervention preferences applicable to both patients and policymakers would make it possible to better confront the needs of the supply and demand sides of the health care system. This study aimed to develop a discrete choice experiments (DCE) questionnaire to elicit the preferences of patients and policymakers. The instrument was specifically developed to estimate preferences for new conditions to be added to a screening program for fetal chromosomal anomalies.

Methods: A DCE development study was conducted. The methods employed included a literature review, a qualitative study (based on individual semi-structured interviews, consultations, and a focus group discussion) with pregnant women and policymakers, and a pilot project with 33 pregnant women to validate the first version of the instrument and test the feasibility of its administration.

Results: An initial list of 10 attributes was built based on a literature review and the qualitative research components of the study. Five attributes were built based on the responses provided by the participants from both groups. Eight attributes were consensually retained. A pilot project performed on 33 pregnant women led to a final instrument containing seven attributes: 'conditions to be screened', 'test performance', 'moment at gestational age to obtain the test result', 'degree of test result certainty to the severity of the disability', 'test sufficiency', 'information provided from test result', and 'cost related to the test'.

Conclusion: It is possible to reach a consensus on the construction of a DCE instrument intended to be administered to pregnant women and policymakers. However, complete validation of the consensual instrument is limited because there are too few voting members of health technology assessment agencies committees to statistically ascertain the relevance of the attributes and their levels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Sample of a choice task in the DCE pilot testing project.

References

    1. Richardson J, Schlander M (2019) Health technology assessment (HTA) and economic evaluation: efficiency or fairness first. J Mark Access Health Policy 7:1557981. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2018.1557981 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brazier JE, Dixon S, Ratcliffe J (2009) The Role of Patient Preferences in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Conflict of Values? PharmacoEconomics 27:705–712. doi: 10.2165/11314840-000000000-00000 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Health Quality Ontario (2019) Noninvasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, sex chromosome aneuploidies, and microdeletions: a health technology assessment. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser Internet 19:1–166. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bianchi DW, Chiu RWK (2018) Sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 379:464–473. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1705345 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trapero-Bertran M, Rodríguez-Martín B, López-Bastida J (2019) What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review. PLOS ONE 14:e0219905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219905 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types