Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986 Jun;31(6):483-6.

Reproductive outcome after microsurgical treatment of tubal pregnancy in women with a single fallopian tube

  • PMID: 3735260

Reproductive outcome after microsurgical treatment of tubal pregnancy in women with a single fallopian tube

G Oelsner et al. J Reprod Med. 1986 Jun.

Abstract

Whether restoration of tubal function following conservative surgery for ectopic pregnancy was achieved can only be estimated in patients with a single tube. Between 1978 and 1983, 22 women with a tubal pregnancy in their single tube underwent conservative microsurgical treatment. In 18 women dorsal salpingotomy was performed, in 3 the tube was gently milked (squeezing the products of conception through the fimbria), and in 1 the segment containing the products of conception was excised and the tube anastomosed. Twenty-one patients desired pregnancy. The mean follow-up period was 21.4 months. Of the patients desiring pregnancy, 76% conceived. The intrauterine pregnancy rate was 47.6%, and the repeat ectopic pregnancy rate was 42.8%. This ectopic pregnancy rate was significantly higher than those quoted in recent literature. Although the study group was a very-high-risk group, restoration of tubal function was achieved in a high proportion of cases. The intrauterine pregnancy rate was high and higher than the best results available with in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, which is the only treatment available after bilateral salpingectomy. Therefore, conservative surgery is definitely indicated in such patients despite the high incidence of repeat ectopic pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by