Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;41(11):1316-1322.
doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01457-4. Epub 2023 Jun 24.

A new workflow of the on-line 1.5-T MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy

Affiliations

A new workflow of the on-line 1.5-T MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy

Takashi Uno et al. Jpn J Radiol. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop a new workflow for 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR)-guided on-line adaptive radiation therapy (MRgART) and assess its feasibility in achieving dose constraints.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical data of patients who underwent on-line adaptive radiation therapy using a 1.5-T MR linear accelerator (MR-Linac). The workflow in MRgART was established by reviewing the disease site, number of fractions, and re-planning procedures. Five cases of prostate cancer were selected to evaluate the feasibility of the new workflow with respect to achieving dose constraints.

Results: Between December 2021 and September 2022, 50 consecutive patients underwent MRgART using a 1.5-T MR-Linac. Of these, 20 had prostate cancer, 10 had hepatocellular carcinoma, 6 had pancreatic cancer, 5 had lymph node oligo-metastasis, 3 had renal cancer, 3 had bone metastasis, 2 had liver metastasis from colon cancer, and 1 had a mediastinal tumor. Among a total of 247 fractions, 235 (95%) were adapt-to-shape (ATS)-based re-planning. The median ATS re-planning time in all 50 cases was 17 min. In the feasibility study, all dose constraint sets were met in all 5 patients by ATS re-planning. Conversely, a total of 14 dose constraints in 5 patients could not be achieved by virtual plan without using adaptive re-planning. These dose constraints included the minimum dose received by the highest irradiated volume of 1 cc in the planning target volume and the maximum dose of the rectal/bladder wall.

Conclusion: A new workflow of 1.5-T MRgART was established and found to be feasible. Our evaluation of the dose constraint achievement demonstrated the effectiveness of the workflow.

Keywords: Adapt to shape; Adaptive radiation therapy; MR-Linac; MRgART; Workflow.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The three authors (MT, KA, and YF) belong to an endowed chair sponsored by Elekta Corporation. The other authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Elekta Unity 1.5-T MR-Linac system. The internal structure consists of a linear accelerator rotating gantry placed outside of the MRI magnets
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Workflow of the MR-guided on-line adaptive radiation therapy (MRgART). The left side of the figure shows the off-line procedure of creating an MR-Linac reference plan prior to the treatment start day. On-line workflow of the adaptive planning was depicted on the right half. Some of the key steps of the on-line MRgART are circled in red. a Pre-treatment MR imaging with the MR-Linac system. b Re-planning with modification of targets, risk organs, or body surface contours (ATS: adapt to shape) and re-planning without any contour modification (ATP: adapt to position). c Evaluation of dose distribution and DVH and assessing achievement status of dose constraints. d Reconfirm the location of the tumor and risk organs with MRI just prior to irradiation. e Irradiation while confirming beam-on imaging with real-time cine MR. f MR images are also taken immediately after the end of irradiation for confirmation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison between the dose distribution and the dose-volume histogram in actual ATS plan and a virtual plan in patient with prostate cancer. All dose constraints are met in the actual ATS (Plan 1), but neither the minimum dose received by the highest irradiated volume of 1 cc (D1cc) in the planning target (PTV) volume nor the maximum dose (Dmax) in the rectal/bladder wall are achieved in the virtual plan (Plan 2). In the virtual plan, both Dmax of the rectal and bladder wall are nearly 110% of the prescribed dose (yellow dotted circles)

References

    1. Lagendijk JJW, Raaymakers BW, Raaijmakers AJE, Overweg J, Brown KJ, Kerkhof EM, et al. MRI/linac integration. Radiother Oncol. 2008;86:25–29. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.10.034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lagendijk JJA, Raaymakers BW, van Vulpen M. The magnetic resonance imaging-linac system. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014;24:207–209. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2014.02.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Woodings SJ, Bluemink JJ, de Vries JHW, Niatsetski Y, van Veelen B, Schillings J, et al. Beam characterisation of the 1.5 T MRI-linac. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63:085015. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aab566. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raaymakers BW, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Bol GH, Glitzner M, Kotte ANTJ, van Asselen B, et al. First patients treated with a 1.5 T MRI-Linac: clinical proof of concept of a high-precision, high-field MRI guided radiotherapy treatment. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:L41–50. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9517. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winkel D, Bol GH, Kroon PS, van Asselen B, Hackett SS, Werensteijn-Honingh A, et al. Adaptive radiotherapy: the Elekta Unity MR-Linac concept. Clin Trans Radiat Oncol. 2019;18:54–59. - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding