Waterlogging stress alters the structure of sugar beet rhizosphere microbial community structure and recruiting potentially beneficial bacterial
- PMID: 37354564
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115172
Waterlogging stress alters the structure of sugar beet rhizosphere microbial community structure and recruiting potentially beneficial bacterial
Abstract
Waterlogging has been shown to have a significant inhibitory effect on plant growth. However, the response mechanisms of the soil environment of sugar beet seedlings under waterlogging conditions still need to be fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the effects of waterlogging treatments on the content of effective nutrients and the microbial communities in the rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere using high-throughput sequencing. We set up waterlogging and non-waterlogging treatments, sampled sugar beet seedlings after 10 days of waterlogging, determined the effective soil nutrients in the rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere of the plants, and analyzed the differences in microbial diversity at ten days of waterlogging. The results showed that waterlogging significantly affected available potassium (AK) content. The Ak content of waterlogged soil was significantly higher than that of non-waterlogged soil. Waterlogging caused no significant difference in available nitrogen (AN) content and pH. Moreover, the plant growth-promoting bacteria Pseudomonas was significantly enriched in sugar beet waterlogged rhizospheres compared with the non-waterlogged ones. Similarly, the harmful fungi Gibellulopsis and Alternaria were enriched in sugar beet non-waterlogged rhizosphere. The network analysis revealed that waterlogging built a less complex root-microbial network than non-waterlogging. These findings implied that sugar beets subjected to waterlogging stress were enriched with beneficial microorganisms in the rhizosphere, potentially alleviating the stress.
Keywords: Beneficial bacteria; High throughput sequencing; Rhizosphere; Sugar beet; Waterlogging stress.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Effects of Waterlogging on Soybean Rhizosphere Bacterial Community Using V4, LoopSeq, and PacBio 16S rRNA Sequence.Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0201121. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02011-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16. Microbiol Spectr. 2022. PMID: 35171049 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Continuous Sugar Beet Cropping on Rhizospheric Microbial Communities.Genes (Basel). 2019 Dec 22;11(1):13. doi: 10.3390/genes11010013. Genes (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31877827 Free PMC article.
-
Potential relevance between soybean nitrogen uptake and rhizosphere prokaryotic communities under waterlogging stress.ISME Commun. 2023 Jul 11;3(1):71. doi: 10.1038/s43705-023-00282-0. ISME Commun. 2023. PMID: 37433864 Free PMC article.
-
Ecological characteristics of sugar beet plant and rhizosphere soil in response to high boron stress: A study of the remediation potential.J Environ Manage. 2024 Apr;356:120655. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120655. Epub 2024 Mar 21. J Environ Manage. 2024. PMID: 38513589
-
Soil microbiome analysis reveals effects of periodic waterlogging stress on sugarcane growth.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 2;18(11):e0293834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293834. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37917788 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Soil Microbial Composition in Rhizospheres Between Wilt Disease-Resistant and Susceptible Melon Varieties.Microorganisms. 2025 Feb 18;13(2):444. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13020444. Microorganisms. 2025. PMID: 40005810 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources