Effects of dynamic and isometric motor practice on position control, force control and corticomuscular coherence in preadolescent children
- PMID: 37354890
- DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2023.103114
Effects of dynamic and isometric motor practice on position control, force control and corticomuscular coherence in preadolescent children
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the effects of motor practice with an emphasis on either position or force control on motor performance, motor accuracy and variability in preadolescent children. Furthermore, we investigated corticomuscular coherence and potential changes following motor practice. We designed a setup allowing discrete wrist flexions of the non-dominant hand and tested motor accuracy and variability when the task was to generate specific movement endpoints (15-75 deg) or force levels (5-25% MVC). All participants were tested in both tasks at baseline and post motor practice without augmented feedback on performance. Following baseline assessment, participants (44 children aged 9-11 years) were randomly assigned to either position (PC) or force control (FC) motor practice or a resting control group (CON). The PC and FC groups performed four blocks of 40 trials motor practice with augmented feedback on performance. Following practice, improvements in movement accuracy were significantly greater in the PC group compared to the FC and CON groups (p < 0.001). None of the groups displayed changes in force task performance indicating no benefits of force control motor practice and low transfer between tasks (p-values:0.08-0.45). Corticomuscular coherence (C4-FCR) was demonstrated during the hold phase in both tasks with no difference between tasks. Corticomuscular coherence did not change from baseline to post practice in any group. Our findings demonstrate that preadolescent children improve position control following dynamic accuracy motor practice. Contrary to previous findings in adults, preadolescent children displayed smaller or no improvements in force control following isometric motor practice, low transfer between tasks and no changes in corticomuscular coherence.
Keywords: Coherence; Force control; Motor control; Motor learning; Position control; Sensory-motor training; Visual feedback.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Increased functional and directed corticomuscular connectivity after dynamic motor practice but not isometric motor practice.J Neurophysiol. 2025 Mar 1;133(3):930-943. doi: 10.1152/jn.00061.2024. Epub 2025 Feb 14. J Neurophysiol. 2025. PMID: 39951554
-
Dynamic motor practice improves movement accuracy, force control and leads to increased corticospinal excitability compared to isometric motor practice.Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jan 5;16:1019729. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1019729. eCollection 2022. Front Hum Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 36684837 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of unilateral contraction of hand muscles on the contralateral corticomuscular coherence during bimanual motor tasks.Neuropsychologia. 2016 May;85:199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.028. Epub 2016 Mar 24. Neuropsychologia. 2016. PMID: 27018484
-
Corticomuscular coherence behavior in fine motor control of force: a critical review.Rev Neurol. 2010 Nov 16;51(10):610-23. Rev Neurol. 2010. PMID: 21069640 Review. English, Spanish.
-
The neuromechanical of Beta-band corticomuscular coupling within the human motor system.Front Neurosci. 2024 Aug 15;18:1441002. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1441002. eCollection 2024. Front Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 39211436 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous