Haemodynamic support for paediatric septic shock: a global perspective
- PMID: 37354910
- DOI: 10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00103-7
Haemodynamic support for paediatric septic shock: a global perspective
Erratum in
-
Correction Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2023; 7: 588-98.Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024 Feb;8(2):e1. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00002-6. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024. PMID: 38242603 No abstract available.
Abstract
Septic shock is a leading cause of hospitalisation, morbidity, and mortality for children worldwide. In 2020, the paediatric Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) issued evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for children with septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction based on the evidence available at the time. There are now more trials from multiple settings, including low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), addressing optimal fluid choice and amount, selection and timing of vasoactive infusions, and optimal monitoring and therapeutic endpoints. In response to developments in adult critical care to trial personalised haemodynamic management algorithms, it is timely to critically reassess the current state of applying SSC guidelines in LMIC settings. In this Viewpoint, we briefly outline the challenges to improve sepsis care in LMICs and then discuss three key concepts that are relevant to management of children with septic shock around the world, especially in LMICs. These concepts include uncertainties surrounding the early recognition of paediatric septic shock, choices for initial haemodynamic support, and titration of ongoing resuscitation to therapeutic endpoints. Specifically, given the evolving understanding of clinical phenotypes, we focus on the controversies surrounding the concepts of early fluid resuscitation and vasoactive agent use, including insights gained from experience in LMICs and high-income countries. We outline the key components of sepsis management that are both globally relevant and translatable to low-resource settings, with a view to open the conversation to the large variety of treatment pathways, especially in LMICs. We emphasise the role of simple and easily available monitoring tools to apply the SSC guidelines and to tailor individualised support to the patient's cardiovascular physiology.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.
Comment in
-
Avoid re-interpreting fluid bolus recommendations for low-income settings.Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023 Nov;7(11):e18. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00257-2. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023. PMID: 37858509 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019. Qatar Med J. 2019. PMID: 31763206 Free PMC article.
-
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb;39(2):165-228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30. Intensive Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23361625 Free PMC article.
-
Sepsis and Septic Shock in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020 Sep;21(7):571-578. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.047. Epub 2020 May 13. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020. PMID: 32401160 Review.
-
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af. Crit Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23353941
-
Impact of early haemodynamic assessment by echocardiography on organ dysfunction and outcome of patients admitted to the emergency department with sepsis or septic shock: protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (GENESIS).BMJ Open. 2025 May 6;15(5):e098304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098304. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40335132 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The value of NT-proBNP, NLR, Ang-1 combined with APACHE II and SOFA scores in evaluating 28-day mortality of septic shock.Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 6;104(23):e42547. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042547. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025. PMID: 40489844 Free PMC article.
-
Use of norepinephrine in the pediatric intensive care unit: an international survey of prescription and administration habits in case of pediatric hypotensive shock.Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jun 5;184(7):392. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06205-6. Eur J Pediatr. 2025. PMID: 40468061
-
Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Children with Shock: POCUS Can Guide.Indian J Pediatr. 2023 Nov;90(11):1065-1066. doi: 10.1007/s12098-023-04772-w. Epub 2023 Aug 2. Indian J Pediatr. 2023. PMID: 37530978 No abstract available.
-
Data-driven analysis that integrates bioinformatics and machine learning uncovers PANoptosis-related diagnostic genes in early pediatric septic shock.Heliyon. 2024 Sep 12;10(18):e37853. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37853. eCollection 2024 Sep 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39315170 Free PMC article.
-
The Resuscitation, Equilibrium and De-escalation (RED) strategy: a phased, personalized hemodynamic support in children with sepsis.Front Pediatr. 2025 Jan 29;13:1530984. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1530984. eCollection 2025. Front Pediatr. 2025. PMID: 39944316 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical