Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 24;13(1):10252.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37358-9.

Predicting in-hospital mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using administrative data and machine learning

Affiliations

Predicting in-hospital mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using administrative data and machine learning

Theyab Alhwiti et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the gold standard treatment for patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. The utility of existing risk prediction tools for in-hospital mortality post-TAVR is limited due to two major factors: (a) the predictive accuracy of these tools is insufficient when only preoperative variables are incorporated, and (b) their efficacy is also compromised when solely postoperative variables are employed, subsequently constraining their application in preoperative decision support. This study examined whether statistical/machine learning models trained with solely preoperative information encoded in the administrative National Inpatient Sample database could accurately predict in-hospital outcomes (death/survival) post-TAVR. Fifteen popular binary classification methods were used to model in-hospital survival/death. These methods were evaluated using multiple classification metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). By analyzing 54,739 TAVRs, the top five classification models had an AUC ≥ 0.80 for two sampling scenarios: random, consistent with previous studies, and time-based, which assessed whether the models could be deployed without frequent retraining. Given the minimal practical differences in the predictive accuracies of the top five models, the L2 regularized logistic regression model is recommended as the best overall model since it is computationally efficient and easy to interpret.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Performance of the top five models by the number of input variables for research question 1. A similar figure for question 2 is presented in the supplementary materials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ranked feature importance for each of the top five models based on the mean ranking for research question 1. A similar figure for question 2 is presented in the supplementary materials.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overview of the modeling workflow of this study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aylin P, Bottle A, Majeed A. Use of administrative data or clinical databases as predictors of risk of death in hospital: Comparison of models. BMJ. 2007;334:1044. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39168.496366.55. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaafarani HM, Rosen AK. Using administrative data to identify surgical adverse events: An introduction to the patient safety indicators. Am. J. Surg. 2009;198:S63–S68. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hernandez-Suarez DF, et al. Machine learning prediction models for in-hospital mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2019;12:1328–1338. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Groth SS, Habermann EB, Massarweh NN. United States administrative databases and cancer registries for thoracic surgery health services research. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2020;109:636–644. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.08.067. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2022). - PubMed