Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Jul;41(7):1983-1989.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04432-w. Epub 2023 Jun 25.

Grade V renal trauma management: results from the multi-institutional genito-urinary trauma study

Affiliations
Free article
Multicenter Study

Grade V renal trauma management: results from the multi-institutional genito-urinary trauma study

Nizar Hakam et al. World J Urol. 2023 Jul.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate management trends for American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade V renal trauma with focus on non-operative management.

Methods: We used prospectively collected data as part of the Multi-institutional Genito-Urinary Trauma Study (MiGUTS). We included patients with grade V renal trauma according to the AAST Injury Scoring Scale 2018 update. All cases submitted by participating centers with radiology images available were independently reviewed to confirm renal trauma grade. Management was classified as expectant, conservative (minimally invasive, endoscopic or percutaneous procedures), or operative (renal-related surgery).

Results: Eighty patients were included, 25 of whom had complete imaging and had independent confirmation of AAST grade V renal trauma. Median age was 35 years (Interquartile range (IQR) 25-50) and 23 (92%) had blunt trauma. Ten patients (40%) were managed operatively with nephrectomy. Conservative management was used in nine patients (36%) of which six received angioembolization and three had a stent or drainage tube placed. Expectant management was followed in six (24%) patients. Transfusion requirements were progressively higher with groups requiring more aggressive treatment, and injury characteristics differed significantly across management groups in terms of hematoma size and laceration size. Vascular contrast extravasation was more likely in operatively managed patients though a statistically significant association was not found.

Conclusion: Successful use of nonoperative management for grade V injuries is used for a substantial subset of patients. Lower transfusion requirement and less severe injury radiologic phenotype appear to be important characteristics delineating this group.

Keywords: Kidney trauma; Nephrectomy; Nonoperative management; Urologic trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Colaco M et al (2019) Nationwide procedural trends for renal trauma management. Ann Surg 269(2):367–369 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broghammer JA, Fisher MB, Santucci RA (2007) Conservative management of renal trauma: a review. Urology 70(4):623–629 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCombie SP et al (2014) The conservative management of renal trauma: a literature review and practical clinical guideline from Australia and New Zealand. BJU Int 114(Suppl 1):13–21 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hakam N et al (2022) Utility and outcome of angioembolization for high-grade renal trauma management in a large hospital-based trauma registry. J Urol 207(5):1077–1085 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Breyer BN et al (2008) Minimally invasive endovascular techniques to treat acute renal hemorrhage. J Urol 179(6):2248–2252 (discussion 2253) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types