Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul:89:102361.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102361. Epub 2023 Jun 1.

Surgical evacuation of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies

Affiliations
Review

Surgical evacuation of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies

Simrit Nijjar et al. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy is associated with significant maternal morbidity, including severe hemorrhage, need for the blood transfusion and hysterectomy. Early diagnosis is therefore key in ensuring timely management, with consensus being that treatment before 9 weeks of gestation leads to reduced morbidity. There is no universally adopted management protocol for cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, but surgical management generally has a higher success rate than medical management. The primary surgical treatment modalities are suction evacuation versus resection of the pregnancy via multiple routes. Adjuncts that have been shown to successfully minimize bleeding with surgical management include cervical cerclage, balloon catheter, and uterine artery embolization. However, there remains a lack of high-quality evidence regarding what is the best surgical treatment option for cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, and therefore it is essential that clinicians provide tailored management to patients considering the presenting symptoms and local expertise with various surgical techniques.

Keywords: Cesarean scar pregnancy; Ectopic; Surgical treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by