Zygomaticotemporal suture maturation evaluation in Chinese population using cone-beam computed tomography images
- PMID: 37357423
- PMCID: PMC10387427
- DOI: 10.4041/kjod23.020
Zygomaticotemporal suture maturation evaluation in Chinese population using cone-beam computed tomography images
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the zygomaticotemporal suture (ZTS) maturation, analyze the age distribution patterns of ZTS maturation stages, and investigate the relationship between ZTS and cervical vertebral maturation (CVM).
Methods: A total of 261 patients who underwent cone-beam computed tomography (112 males, mean age, 13.1 ± 3.3 years; 149 females, mean age, 13.7 ± 3.1 years) were examined to evaluate the ZTS stages. The ZTS stages were defined based on a modified method from previous studies on zygomaticomaxillary sutures. Differences between groups and correlations between indicators were analyzed using the Spearman correlation test, intraclass coefficient of correlation (ICC), one-way analysis of variance and rank sum test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The diagnostic value of CVM stages in identifying ZTS maturation stages was evaluated using positive likelihood ratios (LRs).
Results: A positive relationship was found between the ZTS and CVM stage (r = 0.747, ICC = 0.621, p < 0.01) and between the ZTS stage and chronological age (r = 0.727, ICC = 0.330, p < 0.01). Positive LRs > 10 were found for several cervical stages (CSs), including CS1 and CS2 for the diagnosis of stage B, CS1 to CS3 for the diagnosis of stages B and C, and CS6 for the diagnosis of stages D and E.
Conclusions: The ZTS maturation stage may be more relevant to the CVM stage than to the chronological age. The CVM stages can be good indicators for clinical decisions regarding maxillary protraction, except for CS4 and CS5.
Keywords: Computed tomography; Maxillary protraction; Vertebral maturation; Zygomaticotemporal suture.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
References
-
- Celikoglu M, Buyukcavus MH. Changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone position after maxillary protraction with different alternate rapid maxillary expansion and construction protocols: a prospective clinical study. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:519–25. doi: 10.2319/082316-632.1. https://doi.org/10.2319/082316-632.1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Willmann JH, Nienkemper M, Tarraf NE, Wilmes B, Drescher D. Early Class III treatment with Hybrid-Hyrax - Facemask in comparison to Hybrid-Hyrax-Mentoplate - skeletal and dental outcomes. Prog Orthod. 2018;19:42. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0239-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0239-8. 2fda100b26f54c179891b36314ca90b6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Al Dayeh A, Williams RA, Trojan TM, Claro WI. Deformation of the zygomaticomaxillary and nasofrontal sutures during bone-anchored maxillary protraction and reverse-pull headgear treatments: an ex-vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;156:745–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.12.019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.12.019. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Vracar TR, Claro W, Vracar ME, 2nd, Jenkins RS, Bland L, Dayeh AA. Sutural deformation during bone-anchored maxillary protraction. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021;11:447–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.05.008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.05.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Herring SW. Mechanical influences on suture development and patency. Front Oral Biol. 2008;12:41–56. doi: 10.1159/000115031. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2826139/ - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous