Comparing the effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim®) versus original filgrastim (Neupogen®) for stem cell mobilization in adult and pediatric healthy donors
- PMID: 37357617
- DOI: 10.1177/10781552231171829
Comparing the effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim®) versus original filgrastim (Neupogen®) for stem cell mobilization in adult and pediatric healthy donors
Abstract
Introduction: Filgrastim is used for the mobilization of stem cells in healthy donors. Though several biosimilar filgrastim products have been approved, there is limited literature evaluating biosimilar products for stem cell mobilization. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare the effectiveness of the original filgrastim, Neupogen®, to the biosimilar product, Nivestim®, for stem cell mobilization(SCM) in healthy donors.
Methods: This was a retrospective study that included all healthy donors: adults and pediatrics, who received Neupogen® or Nivestim® for stem cell mobilization between 2014 and 2016 at a comprehensive cancer center. Donors received filgrastim at a dose of 5 mcg/kg every 12 h for 4 days to achieve the target CD34 + cell count of 5-10 × 106 CD34 + /kg of recipient body weight. Additional doses of filgrastim were administered and/or the dose increased if target CD34 + was not achieved. The primary endpoint was the number of doses required to achieve the target CD34 + cell count.
Results: Over the study period, 89 donors received Neupogen® and 68 received Nivestim®. The median age of donors was 19.5 years (3-64) in the Nivestim® group and 15 years (2-16) in the Neupogen® group. The median number of doses required for SCM was eight doses (6-10) in the Nivestim group and eight (6-16) in the Neupogen® group.
Conclusion: Biosimilar Nivestim® was as effective as the original, Neupogen®, for stem cell mobilization for healthy adult and pediatric donors. Larger randomized studies are necessary to evaluate the safety and transplant outcomes of the use of Nivestim®.
Keywords: Neupogen®; Nivestim®; biosimilar; filgrastim; pediatrics.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of original filgrastim (Neupogen®), biosimilar filgrastim (Leucostim®) and Lenograstim (Granocyte®) in CD34(+) peripheral hematopoietic stem cell mobilization procedures for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant donors.Transfus Apher Sci. 2016 Jun;54(3):410-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Mar 24. Transfus Apher Sci. 2016. PMID: 27052362 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of biosimilar filgrastim and originator filgrastim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Transfusion. 2024 Aug;64(8):1402-1406. doi: 10.1111/trf.17909. Epub 2024 Jun 7. Transfusion. 2024. PMID: 38847196
-
Comparison of biosimilar filgrastim with originator filgrastim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and engraftment in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.Transfusion. 2015 Nov;55(11):2709-13. doi: 10.1111/trf.13233. Epub 2015 Jul 14. Transfusion. 2015. PMID: 26173921
-
Biosimilar G-CSF based mobilization of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells for autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation.Theranostics. 2014 Jan 23;4(3):280-9. doi: 10.7150/thno.7752. eCollection 2014. Theranostics. 2014. PMID: 24505236 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical safety of biosimilar recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factors.Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2013 Mar;12(2):235-46. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2013.770472. Epub 2013 Feb 18. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2013. PMID: 23419039 Review.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources