Patient navigation across the cancer care continuum: An overview of systematic reviews and emerging literature

Raymond J Chan^{1

2}, Vivienne E Milch^{1

3

4}, Fiona Crawford-Williams¹, Oluwaseyifunmi Andi Agbejule¹, Ria Joseph¹, Jolyn Johal¹, Narayanee Dick¹, Matthew P Wallen^{1

5}, Julie Ratcliffe¹, Anupriya Agarwal^{3

6

7}, Larissa Nekhlyudov⁸, Matthew Tieu¹, Manaf Al-Momani³, Scott Turnbull³, Rahul Sathiaraj³, Dorothy Keefe^{3

9}, Nicolas H Hart^{1

2

10

11

12}

Affiliations

¹ Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
² Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
³ Cancer Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁴ School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁵ Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
⁶ National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁷ Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁸ Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
⁹ School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
¹⁰ Institute for Health Research, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
¹¹ Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
¹² Human Performance Research Centre, Innovative Solutions for Well-being and Health (INSIGHT) Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

PMID: 37358040
DOI: 10.3322/caac.21788

Free article

Review

Patient navigation across the cancer care continuum: An overview of systematic reviews and emerging literature

Raymond J Chan et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Nov-Dec.

Free article

. 2023 Nov-Dec;73(6):565-589.

doi: 10.3322/caac.21788. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
² Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
³ Cancer Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁴ School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁵ Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
⁶ National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁷ Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁸ Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
⁹ School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
¹⁰ Institute for Health Research, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
¹¹ Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
¹² Human Performance Research Centre, Innovative Solutions for Well-being and Health (INSIGHT) Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

PMID: 37358040
DOI: 10.3322/caac.21788

Abstract

Patient navigation is a strategy for overcoming barriers to reduce disparities and to improve access and outcomes. The aim of this umbrella review was to identify, critically appraise, synthesize, and present the best available evidence to inform policy and planning regarding patient navigation across the cancer continuum. Systematic reviews examining navigation in cancer care were identified in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Epistemonikos, and Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) databases and in the gray literature from January 1, 2012, to April 19, 2022. Data were screened, extracted, and appraised independently by two authors. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Review and Research Syntheses was used for quality appraisal. Emerging literature up to May 25, 2022, was also explored to capture primary research published beyond the coverage of included systematic reviews. Of the 2062 unique records identified, 61 systematic reviews were included. Fifty-four reviews were quantitative or mixed-methods reviews, reporting on the effectiveness of cancer patient navigation, including 12 reviews reporting costs or cost-effectiveness outcomes. Seven qualitative reviews explored navigation needs, barriers, and experiences. In addition, 53 primary studies published since 2021 were included. Patient navigation is effective in improving participation in cancer screening and reducing the time from screening to diagnosis and from diagnosis to treatment initiation. Emerging evidence suggests that patient navigation improves quality of life and patient satisfaction with care in the survivorship phase and reduces hospital readmission in the active treatment and survivorship care phases. Palliative care data were extremely limited. Economic evaluations from the United States suggest the potential cost-effectiveness of navigation in screening programs.

Keywords: cancer navigation; early detection; oncology navigation; patient navigation; screening; survivorship; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Isn't there enough evidence on the benefits of patient navigation?
Paskett ED, Battaglia T, Calhoun EA, Chappell MC, Dwyer A, Fleisher LG, Greenwald J, Wells KJ. Paskett ED, et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Nov-Dec;73(6):562-564. doi: 10.3322/caac.21805. Epub 2023 Jun 26. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023. PMID: 37358050 No abstract available.

References

REFERENCES

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). GLOBOCAN 2020: New Global Cancer Data. IARC; 2022. Accessed May 5, 2023. https://www.uicc.org/news/globocan-2020-new-global-cancer-data
1. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Control Continuum. Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health; 2022. Accessed May 5, 2023. https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/about-dccps/about-cc/cancer-control-con...
1. McCabe MS, Bhatia S, Oeffinger KC, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology statement: achieving high-quality cancer survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(5):631-640. doi:10.1200/jco.2012.46.6854
1. Vardy JL, Chan RJ, Koczwara B, et al. Clinical Oncology Society of Australia position statement on cancer survivorship care. Aust J Gen Pract. 2019;48(12):833-836. doi:10.31128/ajgp-07-19-4999

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.
- Wiley
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information
Miscellaneous
- NCI CPTAC Assay Portal

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Patient navigation across the cancer care continuum: An overview of systematic reviews and emerging literature

Affiliations

Patient navigation across the cancer care continuum: An overview of systematic reviews and emerging literature

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract

Comment in

References

REFERENCES

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Medical

Miscellaneous