Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 14;44(39):4186-4195.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad337.

Triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnants, low-density lipoproteins, and risk of coronary heart disease: a UK Biobank study

Affiliations

Triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnants, low-density lipoproteins, and risk of coronary heart disease: a UK Biobank study

Elias Björnson et al. Eur Heart J. .

Abstract

Aims: The strength of the relationship of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) with risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) compared with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is yet to be resolved.

Methods and results: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with TRL/remnant cholesterol (TRL/remnant-C) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) were identified in the UK Biobank population. In a multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis, TRL/remnant-C was strongly and independently associated with CHD in a model adjusted for apolipoprotein B (apoB). Likewise, in a multivariable model, TRL/remnant-C and LDL-C also exhibited independent associations with CHD with odds ratios per 1 mmol/L higher cholesterol of 2.59 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.99-3.36] and 1.37 [95% CI: 1.27-1.48], respectively. To examine the per-particle atherogenicity of TRL/remnants and LDL, SNPs were categorized into two clusters with differing effects on TRL/remnant-C and LDL-C. Cluster 1 contained SNPs in genes related to receptor-mediated lipoprotein removal that affected LDL-C more than TRL/remnant-C, whereas cluster 2 contained SNPs in genes related to lipolysis that had a much greater effect on TRL/remnant-C. The CHD odds ratio per standard deviation (Sd) higher apoB for cluster 2 (with the higher TRL/remnant to LDL ratio) was 1.76 (95% CI: 1.58-1.96), which was significantly greater than the CHD odds ratio per Sd higher apoB in cluster 1 [1.33 (95% CI: 1.26-1.40)]. A concordant result was obtained by using polygenic scores for each cluster to relate apoB to CHD risk.

Conclusion: Distinct SNP clusters appear to impact differentially on remnant particles and LDL. Our findings are consistent with TRL/remnants having a substantially greater atherogenicity per particle than LDL.

Keywords: Apolipoprotein B; Cardiovascular disease; Genetics; LDL cholesterol; Mendelian randomization; Remnants; Single-nucleotide polymorphisms; Triglyceride; UK Biobank.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Structured Graphical Abstract
Structured Graphical Abstract
Cluster-based SNP analysis showing higher per particle atherogenicity for triglyceride-rich lipoproteins/remnants than for low density lipoproteins.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Identification of genes influencing TRL/remnant cholesterol. Plotting the beta coefficients (beta coefficients can be interpreted as the amount that a SNP, per effect-allele, increases or decreases the biomarker in question. Hence, it can be interpreted as a genetically predicted change in apoB, LDL-C, and TRL/remnant-C. For LDL-C and TRL/remnant-C, the effect, per allele, is measured in mmol/L cholesterol, and for apoB, the effect is measured in g/L) for TRL/remnant-C vs. apoB or LDL-C (for the 1125 SNPs identified in the GWAS) revealed the presence of two clusters. In one cluster, SNPs (marked blue) were characterized by having a larger effect size on TRL/remnant-C relative to apoB (A) or to LDL-C (B), while in the other cluster (marked red), SNPs had a smaller effect on TRL/remnant-C relative to apoB or to LDL-C. (C) Histogram of the TRL/remnant-C to apoB beta coefficient ratio for the 1125 SNPs. The two clusters were defined formally based on range limits for the ratio of TRL/remnant-C to apoB. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms were allocated to cluster 1 if they had a ratio between 0.33 and 1.1 and to cluster 2 if the ratio was >1.33. (D) Distribution of SNP effect sizes on TRL/remnant-C relative to LDL-C in the two defined clusters.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association of apoB with TRL-C and CHD risk in clusters 1 and 2. (A) Association of TRL/remnant-C with apoB in each SNP cluster with the exposure allele defined as the variant raising apoB. ApoB has units of g/L, and TRL/remnant-C has units of mmol/L. Panels (B) and (C) show, for clusters 1 and 2, respectively, each SNPs’ effect on apoB and on CHD (prevalent + incident) outcome [note that the x-axis for cluster 1 in (B) has been truncated to allow better visual comparison with the apoB range for cluster 2 in (C)]. Data points in (B) and (C) are colored as less translucent the lower the P value for apoB. Mendelian randomization modeling (inverse variance–weighted method) was used to determine the odds ratio (OR) for CHD risk per Sd change in apoB (0.23 g/L) for each cluster in the cohort of subjects off or on lipid-lowering treatment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Association of polygenic scores for clusters 1 and 2 with TRL/remnant-C and CHD risk. Subjects without a history of CHD were divided into deciles according to the cluster-specific PGS; for each PGS, the relationship of apoB to TRL/remnant-C was examined (A). For illustrative purposes, hazard ratios (HRs) for CHD events (using decile 5 as referent for each PGS) were estimated for each decile of cluster 1 PGS and cluster 2 PGS (B). To compare the gradient of association of apoB with CHD risk between clusters, a single Cox model was constructed that included the scaled cluster 1 PGS and cluster 2 PGS as continuous variables. The derived HRs per 1 Sd change in apoB are given in (B).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Impact of variation in genes influencing lipolysis and those influencing lipoprotein receptors on TRL/remnant and LDL metabolism. In this schematic, the putative differential effects of variants of reduced functionality are depicted in boxes. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins remnants are defined as lipoprotein particles that have undergone partial lipolysis.,, SNPs in genes that cause a reduction in the efficiency of lipolysis (‘cluster 2’ SNPs) potentially increase the rate of TRL/remnant particle formation but have smaller effects on LDL. Since TRL/remnants contain apoB, there is a modest increment in plasma total apoB levels. Metabolic studies have established that VLDL- and chylomicron-remnants are cleared from the circulation by the LDL receptor and possibly other receptors binding to apoB on the particle surface and facilitating endocytosis and degradation., Cluster 1 SNPs which reduce the activity of the LDL receptor or alter the ligand, apoB, affect remnant clearance and cause increases in the concentration of both TRL/remnant and LDL particles with a consequent substantial rise in plasma apoB.

Comment in

References

    1. Nordestgaard BG. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: new insights from epidemiology, genetics, and biology. Circ Res 2016;118:547–563. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306249 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ginsberg HN, Packard CJ, Chapman MJ, Boren J, Aguilar-Salinas CA, Averna M, et al. . Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and their remnants: metabolic insights, role in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and emerging therapeutic strategies-a consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J 2021;42:4791–4806. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab551 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dallinga-Thie GM, Kroon J, Boren J, Chapman MJ. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and remnants: targets for therapy? Curr Cardiol Rep 2016;18:67. 10.1007/s11886-016-0745-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Varbo A, Nordestgaard BG. Remnant lipoproteins. Curr Opin Lipidol 2017;28:300–307. 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000429 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boren J, Taskinen MR, Bjornson E, Packard CJ. Metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in health and dyslipidaemia. Nat Rev Cardiol 2022;19:577–592. 10.1038/s41569-022-00676-y - DOI - PubMed