Comparison of incidental findings on cone beam computed tomographic and 2-dimensional images

Abstract

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides a 3-dimensional (3D) view of the patient and has a high frequency of incidental findings (IFs) that do not relate to the area of interest. Many of these IFs are not always visible on 2-dimensional (2D) intraoral or panoramic radiographs. Thus, the aim of the present study was to assess the IFs that did or did not appear on 3D vs 2D images. Significant IFs were recorded from a review of 510 CBCT reports by board-certified oral and maxillofacial radiologists. The IFs on CBCTs with 5-, 8-, and 11-cm fields of view (n = 170 per group) were recorded. A subset of these significant IFs was also viewed on intra-oral and panoramic radiographs to determine whether they were or were not visible in 2D imaging. A total of 677 significant IFs were discovered on 302 (59.2%) of the 510 reports. When a subset of 293 IFs was reviewed on intraoral and panoramic imaging, 112 (38.2%) were not visible on 2D radiographs, while 50 (17.1%) could not be confirmed with certainty. The frequency of significant IFs on CBCT imaging is high and increases with larger fields of view. A substantial number of these findings could not be seen on 2D radiographs, implying that many IFs are visible only on 3D images. Clinicians who order CBCT scans need to carefully review the volume in its entirety, regardless of previous imaging, so as not to miss any significant and relevant findings.

Keywords: cone beam computed tomography; incidental findings; intraoral radiographs; jaw lesions; panoramic radiographs.