Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 26:10:e39249.
doi: 10.2196/39249.

Barriers to Telemedicine Use: Qualitative Analysis of Provider Perspectives During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Milan Patel #  1 , Hanna Berlin #  2 , Abishek Rajkumar #  2 , Sarah L Krein  3   4 , Rebecca Miller  5 , Jessie DeVito  5 , Jake Roy  5 , Margaret Punch  6 , Chad Ellimootti  4   7 , Alex F Peahl  4
Affiliations

Barriers to Telemedicine Use: Qualitative Analysis of Provider Perspectives During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Milan Patel et al. JMIR Hum Factors. .

Abstract

Background: Though telemedicine is a promising approach for removing barriers to care and improving access for patients, telemedicine use for many medical specialties has decreased from its peak during the acute COVID-19 public health crisis. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to the maintenance of web-based visits-one key component of telemedicine-is critical for ensuring the continuous availability of this service for patients.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to describe medical providers' perceived barriers and facilitators to the continued use of web-based visits to inform quality improvement efforts and promote sustainability.

Methods: We performed a qualitative content analysis of free-text responses from a survey of medical providers administered from February 5-14, 2021, at a large, midwestern academic institution, including all providers from medical professions that offered telemedicine (eg, physicians, residents or fellows, nurse practitioners, physicians assistants, or nurses) who completed at least 1 web-based visit from March 20, 2020, to February 14, 2021. The primary outcome was the experience of providing web-based visits, including barriers and facilitators to continued usage of web-based visits. Survey questions included 3 major domains: quality of care, technology, and satisfaction. Responses were coded using qualitative content analysis and further analyzed through a matrix analysis to understand the providers' perspectives and elucidate key barriers and facilitators of web-based visit usage.

Results: Of 2692 eligible providers, 1040 (38.6%) completed the survey, of whom 702 were providers from medical professions that offered telemedicine. These providers spanned 7 health care professions and 47 clinical departments. The most common professions represented were physicians (486/702, 46.7%), residents or fellows (85/702, 8.2%), and nurse practitioners (81/702, 7.8%), while the most common clinical departments were internal medicine (69/702, 6.6%), psychiatry (69/702, 6.6%), and physical medicine and rehabilitation (67/702, 6.4%). The following 4 overarching categories of provider experience with web-based visits emerged: quality of care, patient rapport, visit flow, and equity. Though many providers saw web-based visits as a tool for improving care access, quality, and equity, others shared how appropriate selection of web-based visits, support (eg, patient training, home devices, and broadband access), and institutional and nationwide optimization (eg, relaxation of licensing requirements across state borders and reimbursement for phone-only modalities) were needed to sustain web-based visits.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate key barriers to the maintenance of telemedicine services following the acute public health crisis. These findings can help prioritize the most impactful methods of sustaining and expanding telemedicine availability for patients who prefer this method of care delivery.

Keywords: access; barriers and facilitators; health care; implementation; patient care; provider perspectives; public health crisis; telehealth; virtual visits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: AFP is a paid consultant for Maven Clinic. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Matrix coding summary of provider telemedicine experience.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Peahl AF, Powell A, Berlin H, Smith RD, Krans E, Waljee J, Dalton VK, Heisler M, Moniz MH. Patient and provider perspectives of a new prenatal care model introduced in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(4):384.e1–384.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.008. https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(20)31180-7/fulltext S0002-9378(20)31180-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosen CS, Morland LA, Glassman LH, Marx BP, Weaver K, Smith CA, Pollack S, Schnurr PP. Virtual mental health care in the veterans health administration's immediate response to coronavirus disease-19. Am Psychol. 2021;76(1):26–38. doi: 10.1037/amp0000751. https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2020-81589-001.html 2020-81589-001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chao GF, Ehlers AP, Ellimoottil C, Varban OA, Dimick JB, Telem DA. Convergent mixed methods exploration of telehealth in bariatric surgery: maximizing provider resources and access. Obes Surg. 2021;31(4):1877–1881. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05059-1. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11695-020-05059-1 10.1007/s11695-020-05059-1 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mehrotra A, Chernew ME, Linetsky D, Hatch H, Cutler DM, Schneider EC. The impact of COVID-19 on outpatient visits in 2020: visits remained stable, despite a late surge in cases. The Commonwealth Fund. 2021. [2023-05-16]. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/2021/feb/impact-covid-19-o... .
    1. Patel SY, Mehrotra A, Huskamp HA, Uscher-Pines L, Ganguli I, Barnett ML. Trends in outpatient care delivery and telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(3):388–391. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5928. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2773059 2773059 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources