Comparison of video laryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy for intubation success in critically ill patients: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
- PMID: 37358992
- PMCID: PMC10289197
- DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1193514
Comparison of video laryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy for intubation success in critically ill patients: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: This review compares the efficacy of video laryngoscopy (VL) with direct laryngoscopy (DL) for successful tracheal intubation in critically ill or emergency-care patients.
Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared one or more video laryngoscopes to DL. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and network meta-analysis were used to investigate factors potentially influencing the efficacy of VL. The primary outcome was the success rate of first-attempt intubation.
Results: This meta-analysis included 4244 patients from 22 RCTs. After sensitivity analysis, the pooled analysis revealed no significant difference in the success rate between VL and DL (VL vs. DL, 77.3% vs. 75.3%, respectively; OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.84-2.20; I2 = 80%; low-quality evidence). However, based on a moderate certainty of evidence, VL outperformed DL in the subgroup analyses of intubation associated with difficult airways, inexperienced practitioners, or in-hospital settings. In the network meta-analysis comparing VL blade types, nonchanneled angular VL provided the best outcomes. The nonchanneled Macintosh video laryngoscope ranked second, and DL ranked third. Channeled VL was associated with the worst treatment outcomes.
Discussion: This pooled analysis found, with a low certainty of evidence, that VL does not improve intubation success relative to DL. Channeled VL had low efficacy in terms of intubation success compared with nonchanneled VL and DL.
Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=285702, identifier: CRD42021285702.
Keywords: critical care; intubation; laryngoscopy; network meta-analysis; randomized controlled trial.
Copyright © 2023 Kim, Ahn, Kim, Lim, Jang, Cho, Shin, Lee, Lee, Choi, Na and Kwon.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Video versus direct laryngoscopy in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Crit Care. 2024 Jan 2;28(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04727-9. Crit Care. 2024. PMID: 38167459 Free PMC article.
-
Direct Laryngoscopy Versus Video Laryngoscopy for Intubation in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Trials.Crit Care Med. 2024 Nov 1;52(11):1674-1685. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006402. Epub 2024 Sep 18. Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 39292762
-
Video Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Intubation: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2024 Jan 5;16(1):e51720. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51720. eCollection 2024 Jan. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38322075 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparing the effectiveness and safety of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in the paediatric emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 19;11:1373460. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1373460. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 39364015 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) Revealing the Future of Airway Management: Video Laryngoscopy vs. Macintosh Laryngoscopy for Enhanced Clinical Outcomes.Cureus. 2023 Dec 17;15(12):e50648. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50648. eCollection 2023 Dec. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38229823 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Video laryngoscopy may improve the intubation outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Emerg Med J. 2025 Apr 22;42(5):334-342. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213860. Emerg Med J. 2025. PMID: 39358006 Free PMC article.
-
Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in achieving successful emergency endotracheal intubations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 12;13(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02500-9. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38475918 Free PMC article.
-
Machine Learning Predictions and Identifying Key Predictors for Safer Intubation: A Study on Video Laryngoscopy Views.J Pers Med. 2024 Aug 25;14(9):902. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090902. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 39338156 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison of McGrath MAC, AIRWAY SCOPE®, and AceScope® video laryngoscopes in novice healthcare providers: a randomized crossover simulation study.BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03094-y. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025. PMID: 40281396 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of video laryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Eur J Med Res. 2025 Apr 15;30(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02525-3. Eur J Med Res. 2025. PMID: 40229889 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sulser S, Ubmann D, Schlaepfer M, Brueesch M, Goliasch G, Seifert B, et al. . C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. (2016) 33:943–8. 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000525 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jaber S, Amraoui J, Lefrant JY, Arich C, Cohendy R, Landreau L, et al. . Clinical practice and risk factors for immediate complications of endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a prospective, multiple-center study. Crit Care Med. (2006) 34:2355–61. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000233879.58720.87 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources