Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 8:14:1115973.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1115973. eCollection 2023.

Livestock phenomics and genetic evaluation approaches in Africa: current state and future perspectives

Affiliations

Livestock phenomics and genetic evaluation approaches in Africa: current state and future perspectives

Isidore Houaga et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

The African livestock sector plays a key role in improving the livelihoods of people through the supply of food, improved nutrition and consequently health. However, its impact on the economy of the people and contribution to national GDP is highly variable and generally below its potential. This study was conducted to assess the current state of livestock phenomics and genetic evaluation methods being used across the continent, the main challenges, and to demonstrate the effects of various genetic models on the accuracy and rate of genetic gain that could be achieved. An online survey of livestock experts, academics, scientists, national focal points for animal genetic resources, policymakers, extension agents and animal breeding industry was conducted in 38 African countries. The results revealed 1) limited national livestock identification and data recording systems, 2) limited data on livestock production and health traits and genomic information, 3) mass selection was the common method used for genetic improvement with very limited application of genetic and genomic-based selection and evaluation, 4) limited human capacity, infrastructure, and funding for livestock genetic improvement programmes, as well as enabling animal breeding policies. A joint genetic evaluation of Holstein-Friesian using pooled data from Kenya and South Africa was piloted. The pilot analysis yielded higher accuracy of prediction of breeding values, pointing to possibility of higher genetic gains that could be achieved and demonstrating the potential power of multi-country evaluations: Kenya benefited on the 305-days milk yield and the age at first calving and South Africa on the age at first calving and the first calving interval. The findings from this study will help in developing harmonized protocols for animal identification, livestock data recording, and genetic evaluations (both national and across-countries) as well as in designing subsequent capacity building and training programmes for animal breeders and livestock farmers in Africa. National governments need to put in place enabling policies, the necessary infrastructure and funding for national and across country collaborations for a joint genetic evaluation which will revolutionize the livestock genetic improvement in Africa.

Keywords: Africa; ICT and mobile technologies; animal identification; genetic evaluation; livestock data recording.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author VO was employed by Aviagen Limited. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Proportion of livestock species with both performance and pedigree/genotypic data recorded (p < 0.01).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Proportion of available livestock data in Africa (p < 0.001).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Custodians of reported livestock data in Africa (p < 0.001).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Proportions of livestock genetic evaluation methods in Africa. BGE, Based on Genetic evaluation; BGS, Based on Genomic evaluation; BMS, Based on mass selection; a,b,c p < 0.001.

References

    1. Banos G., Smith C. (1991). Selecting bulls across countries to maximize genetic improvement in dairy cattle. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 108 (1–6), 174–181. 10.1111/j.1439-0388.1991.tb00172.x - DOI
    1. Burrow H. M., Mrode R., Mwai A. O., Coffey M. P., Hayes B. J. (2021). Challenges and opportunities in applying genomic selection to ruminants owned by smallholder farmers. Agriculture 11, 1172. 10.3390/agriculture11111172 - DOI
    1. Cardoso F. F., Matika O., Djikeng A., Mapholi N., Burrow H. M., Yokoo M. J. I., et al. (2021). Multiple country and breed genomic prediction of tick resistance in beef cattle. Front. Immunol. 12, 620847. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.620847 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Falconer D. S., Mackay T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Essex, England: Prentice Hall.
    1. FAOSTAT (2019). FAO FAOSTAT Statistical Database. Data derived from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/WCAD (Accessed May 20, 2023).

LinkOut - more resources