Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 21:1-12.
doi: 10.1007/s12369-023-00975-5. Online ahead of print.

(Hu)man-Like Robots: The Impact of Anthropomorphism and Language on Perceived Robot Gender

Affiliations

(Hu)man-Like Robots: The Impact of Anthropomorphism and Language on Perceived Robot Gender

Eileen Roesler et al. Int J Soc Robot. .

Abstract

Implementing anthropomorphic features to robots is a frequently used approach to create positive perceptions in human-robot interaction. However, anthropomorphism does not always lead to positive consequences and might trigger a more gendered perception of robots. More precisely, anthropomorphic features of robots seem to evoke a male-robot bias. Yet, it is unclear if this bias is induced via a male appearance of higher anthropomorphic robots, a general male-technology bias, or even due to language aspects. As the word robot is differently grammatically gendered in different languages, this might be associated with the representation of robot gender. To target these open questions, we investigated how the degree of anthropomorphism and the way the word robot is gendered in different languages, as well as within one language influence the perceived gender of the robot. We therefore conducted two online-studies in which participants were presented with pictures of differently anthropomorphic robots. The first study investigated two different samples from which one was conducted in German, as grammatically-gendered language, and one in English as natural gender language. We did not find significant differences between both languages. Robots with a higher degree of anthropomorphism were perceived as significantly more male than neutral or female. The second study investigated the effect of grammatically-gendered descriptions (feminine, masculine, neuter) on the perception of robots. This study revealed that masculine grammatical gender tends to reinforce a male ascription of gender-neutral robots. The results suggest that the male-robot bias found in previous studies seems to be associated with appearance of most anthropomorphic robots, and the grammatical gender the robot is referenced by.

Keywords: Anthropomorphism; Appearance; Gender associations; Language; Male-robot bias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean and ± 1 SD of gender ratings for all robots. All robots in this study were colored in gray and white shades, and any brand names or logos were removed. Colors and shapes indicate degree of anthropomorphism: circle/light gray = low, triangle/medium gray = medium, square/black = high, and asterisks indicate significance of differences to the value 50 p values: *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001

References

    1. Onnasch L, Roesler E. A taxonomy to structure and analyze human-robot interaction. Int J Soc Robot. 2021;13(4):833–849. doi: 10.1007/s12369-020-00666-5. - DOI
    1. Roesler E, Manzey D, Onnasch L. A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of anthropomorphism in human-robot interaction. Sci Robot. 2021;6(58):eabj5425. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abj5425. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fischer K. Tracking anthropomorphizing behavior in human-robot interaction. J Hum Robot Interact. 2022 doi: 10.1145/3442677. - DOI
    1. Waytz A, Cacioppo J, Epley N. Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspect Psychol Sci J Assoc Psychol Sci. 2010;5(24839457):219–232. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369336. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duffy BR. Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robot Auton Syst. 2003;42(3):177–190. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources