Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Abstract

The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State The Netherlands and co-rapporteur Member State Germany for the pesticide active substance dimethomorph and the assessment of applications for maximum residue levels (MRLs) are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of dimethomorph as a fungicide applied via foliar spraying on field strawberry and grapevine crops and permanent greenhouse lettuce crops; via drenching on field and permanent greenhouse strawberry crops and via dripping on permanent greenhouse strawberry crops. The peer review also provided considerations on whether exposure to humans and the environment from the representative uses of dimethomorph can be considered negligible, taking into account the European Commission's draft guidance on this topic. MRLs were assessed in potatoes, other root and tuber vegetables (except radishes), stem vegetables (except celery, leeks, globe artichokes, sugar beet, cereal forage and straw). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment and the proposed MRLs, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. The concerns are reported where identified.

Keywords: MRL Article 10; dimethomorph; fungicide; peer review; pesticide; risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. ECHA (European Chemicals Agency) and EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) with the technical support of the Joint Research Centre (JRC) , Andersson N, Arena M, Auteri D, Barmaz S, Grignard E, Kienzler A, Lepper P, Lostia AM, Munn S, Parra Morte JM, Pellizzato F, Tarazona J, Terron A and Van der Linden S, 2018. Guidance for the identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EU) No 528/2012 and (EC) No 1107/2009. EFSA Journal 2018;16(6):5311,135 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5311. ECHA‐18‐G‐01‐EN. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. ECHA RAC (European Chemicals Agency Committee for Risk Assessment) , 2019. Opinion proposing harmonized classification and labelling at EU level of dimethomorph (ISO); (E,Z)‐4‐(3‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐3‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)acryloyl)morpholine. Adopted 20 September 2019. Reference: CLH‐O‐0000001412‐86‐298/F; Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/8c2bdfa6-bd1f-15d2-8c76-fd8c0d38695b
    1. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) , 2008. Opinion on a request from EFSA related to the default Q10 value used to describe the temperature effect on transformation rates of pesticides in soil. EFSA Journal 2008;6(1):622, 32 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.622 - DOI
    1. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) , 2009. Guidance on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals on request from EFSA. EFSA Journal 2009;7(12):1438, 358 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1438 - DOI
    1. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) , 2013. EFSA Guidance Document on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees). EFSA Journal 2013;11(7):3295, 268 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3295 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources