Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 1:1-15.
doi: 10.1007/s10460-023-10453-3. Online ahead of print.

Tackling land's 'stubborn materiality': the interplay of imaginaries, data and digital technologies within farmland assetization

Affiliations

Tackling land's 'stubborn materiality': the interplay of imaginaries, data and digital technologies within farmland assetization

Sarah Ruth Sippel. Agric Human Values. .

Abstract

The nature of farming is - still - an essentially biological, and thus volatile, system, which poses substantial challenges to its integration into financialized capitalism. Financial investors often seek stability and predictability of returns that are hardly compatible with agriculture - but which are increasingly seen as achievable through data and digital farming technologies. This paper investigates how farmland investment brokers engage with, perceive, and produce farming data for their investors within a co-constructive process. Tackling land's 'stubborn materiality' for investment, I argue, has material and immaterial components: it includes the re-imagination of farming as a financial asset that delivers reliable income streams for investors; and the re-engineering of farmland's concrete materialities with digital farming technologies. Farmland investment brokers develop investor-suitable farmland imaginaries, underpinned by storytelling as well as the calculative 'evidence' of (digital) data. At the same time, digital technologies have become a key tool for transforming farms into 'investment grade assets' endowed with the rich data on farm performance and financial returns requested by investors. I conclude that the assetization and digitization of farmland need to be seen as closely intertwined and mutually reinforcing processes and identify key areas for future research on this intersection.

Keywords: Assetization; Digital data; Digital farming; Digital technologies; Farmland investment; Land imaginaries.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Appadurai A. The Social Life of Things: commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
    1. Besedovsky N. Uncertain meanings of risk. In: Beckert J, Bronk R, editors. Uncertain Futures: Imaginaries, Narratives, and calculation in the economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018. pp. 236–256.
    1. Birch K. Rethinking value in the bio-economy: finance, assetization, and the management of value. Science Technology & Human Values. 2017;42(3):460–490. doi: 10.1177/0162243916661633. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birch K. Reflexive expectations in innovation financing: an analysis of venture capital as a mode of valuation. Social Studies of Science. 2023;53(1):29–48. doi: 10.1177/03063127221118372. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birch, K., and F. Muniesa, eds. 2020. Assetization: turning things into assets in technoscientific capitalism. MIT Press.

LinkOut - more resources